Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Mohammad Mokhber

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 14:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Saint Naum‎

    Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 14:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Atomic Cartoons

    Reason: IP-hopping vandal returned shortly after previous protection expired. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Spin Master

    Reason: IP-hopping vandal returned shortly after previous protection expired. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Cultural appropriation

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – most of the non-users edited since the beginning of this year were reverted + a contentious topic. FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Why don't you just block them? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Okezie Ikpeazu

    Reason: Persisant IP vandalism. Catfurball (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    List of names of Asian cities in different languages

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have a problem with a new editor not understanding the process of adding sources..... Let's make this unedible for them for a few days until we can figure this out. Best we teach them what to do than just block them out right. Moxy🍁 15:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Sukihana

    Reason: Something has happened On The Internet for fans (or enemies?) to keep adding "magician" to this rapper's article, without a source. It's tiresome. 46.69.215.187 (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Alice Guo

    Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 16:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The Raja Saab

    Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent additions of unsourced content by IP editors, especially on the cast section and release dates. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Taliban

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 48JCL (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:87.209.46.135

    Reason: Targeted harassment by WP:LTA/DTHD. –LDM2003 talk to me! 18:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protected for a period of the duration of the IP's block, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Animals United

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption basically same dynamic IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    2014 Isla Vista killings

    I would like to request that someone give this article a serious look through. There are numerous grammatical errors, as if someone who is not a native English speaker wrote it. Errors are primarily subject/verb agreement. 133.130.185.232 (talk) 01:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    This isn't really an edit request. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.
    Not donefor the bot. Favonian (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Marjorie Taylor Greene

    The quote below is misleading in that Plan B can prevent a fertilized egg from implantation. This information is found on the box of Plan B. Ms Greene's use of the term "baby" is understood by most to mean a human being in germinal form. I would like the entire quote removed. Barring that then adding that Plan B can prevent implantation of a fertilized egg. Thanks. "In 2021, Greene falsely claimed that the Plan B contraceptive "kills a baby in the womb"; Plan B actually prevents ovulation and thus prevents pregnancy, instead of terminating a pregnancy.[168][169]" 99.11.248.241 (talk) 17:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Given the passage can be sourced to the references cited (the "[168][169]" in the excerpt above), it's unlikely to be removed. I'd also strongly suggest finding a less-volatile topic area. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done. The phrase "understood by most" above is a made-up fact that would need backing up, and therefore this isn't a valid rationale to remove the quotation. There may be a fertilized egg that isn't yet implanted, but there is no "baby in the womb" because nothing is attached to the womb. This is in fact what Plan B is intended to prevent. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.