Category talk:Roman gentes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Please add an explanation to the header. There is no article at gente. Piccadilly 11:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done - it's the plural of gens not of gente. User|Neddyseagoon 15:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which of them "Etruscan" ?[edit]

Is there a list about that? Böri (talk) 11:04, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caecina, Cilnia, Caesennia, Licinia, Lucretia, Herminia, Lartia, Popilii, Tarquinii, Manlii, Postumii, Menenii, Veturii, Verginii, Aequlii, Aternii, Romilii, Tarquitii, Canuleii, Laetorii, Maecilii, Aebutii, Aburii, Campatii, Egnatii, Nigidii, Fulcinii, Saenii, Ancharii, Martii, Arminii, Petronii, Vibii, Afinii, Betui, Volcacii, Seii, Vicirii, Salvii what else? Böri (talk) 11:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sabine gentes[edit]

Claudia (gens), Aemilia (gens), Veturia (gens), Sertoria (gens), Curtius (gens), Titia (gens) ?, Valerius, Pompilia (gens), Pomponia (gens), Calpurnia (gens), Maria (gens) ?, Lollia (gens) ?, Fabia (gens) ? Böri (talk) 11:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

subcategorization[edit]

Since Category:Roman gentes is a subcategory of Category:Ancient Roman families and Category:Prosopography of Ancient Rome, individual articles on the gentes don't need to be in these latter two categories. But categorization within Category:Roman gentes might be backwards. For example: Category:Aemilii, containing individuals of the gens, should be a subcategory of Category:Aemilia (gens) (or whatever we should call such a category: see discussion here). Or not. Just trying to sort this out. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]