Draft:Indigenous communism

• Comment: Is this the same as primitive communism? -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

---

Indigenous Communism

Indigenous communism refers to an economic system characterized by communal ownership and collective decision-making, prevalent in various indigenous cultures globally. This system has historical roots that can be traced back to the Neolithic Revolution approximately 12,000 years ago, as evidenced by archaeological findings. These findings suggest that communal resource management was an integral part of early societal structures long before the advent of formal written history. The formal academic recognition and study of indigenous communal systems did not emerge until much later, gaining significant attention towards the end of the 20th century. A critical moment in this recognition was the 1990 publication of Elinor Ostrom's influential book, Governing the Commons. Ostrom's work highlighted the efficiency of communal resource management across various cultural groups, including indigenous communities. Her research challenged conventional economic governance models and spurred a broader discourse on alternative economic systems.

After Ostrom's contributions, scholars such as Garrett Hardin, James Acheson, and Mancur Olson expanded on the topic. Hardin's seminal 1968 article, "The Tragedy of the Commons" along with further studies by Acheson and Olson, enriched the literature on communal ownership and collective decision-making. The relevance of indigenous communism began to have a more significant impact on economic literature in the early 21st century, driven by a growing recognition by economists and policymakers of the importance of traditional knowledge systems. This recognition was particularly pertinent in addressing contemporary issues like environmental degradation and social inequality. This period marked a shift in economic studies, emphasizing the importance of diverse economic models and the contributions of indigenous practices to sustainable development and resource management. Such developments underscore the ongoing relevance of indigenous communism in providing valuable insights into sustainable economic practices.

Indigenous Communism versus Capitalism

Indigenous communism represents a distinct economic model that diverges significantly from classical Capitalism, primarily emphasizing communal ownership and collective decision-making rather than individual property rights and competitive markets. At its core, indigenous communism is founded on the principle that resources within a community are shared collectively, with decisions made in the interests of the group rather than the individual. This model relies on a variety of economic mechanisms that manage common pool resources (CPRs), such as land, water, and forests, to ensure sustainable use and equitable distribution among all members. In comparison to capitalism, which is characterized by competitive markets, private property rights, and profit maximization, indigenous communism focuses on sustainability, equity, and collective welfare. The economic models used in indigenous communism typically involve complex social norms and rules that govern the access to, and use of, resources. These models prioritize long-term community well-being over short-term individual gains, contrasting sharply with the capitalist emphasis on individual entrepreneurship and market competition. This fundamental difference highlights the diverse approaches to solving economic problems related to resource allocation and sustainability.

Elinor Ostrom’s Research

Elinor Ostrom, an esteemed American political economist, was pivotal in highlighting the principles of indigenous communism within economic scholarship. Her seminal 1990 work, Governing the Commons, challenged the then-prevailing narrative of the "Tragedy of the commons," a theory advanced by Garrett Hardin in 1968. Hardin suggested that individual users, acting according to self-interest, would inevitably lead to the overuse and depletion of common resources. Contrasting Hardin’s pessimistic view, Ostrom's empirical research across diverse cultures demonstrated that communities could effectively govern shared resources sustainably without the need for stringent top-down regulation or privatization.Her studies revealed how communities employed locally adapted norms and rules to enforce responsible usage and maintenance of these resources.

Key Concepts and Findings

Ostrom identified several critical design principles that contribute to the success of communal governance systems. She observed that successful communal governance requires clearly defined boundaries, where individuals entitled to resource usage and the resources themselves are distinctly outlined. Moreover, the governance rules must align with local conditions to ensure relevance and effectiveness. Ostrom emphasized the importance of collective-choice arrangements, allowing most individuals affected by operational rules to participate in modifying these rules. Effective monitoring by accountable monitors, either from within the community or appointed, ensures compliance and the integrity of resource usage.

Furthermore, Ostrom highlighted the need for graduated sanctions for rule violators, accessible conflict-resolution mechanisms, and recognition of the community's right to organize. These governance activities, she noted, often occur within nested enterprises that manage appropriation, provision, monitoring, enforcement, and conflict resolution at multiple layers, ensuring comprehensive management and sustainability. Ostrom’s principles have been widely applied in various fields, such as environmental management, development studies, and public administration, showcasing the broad applicability and impact of her work across different sectors and disciplines. Her contributions have not only enriched economic thought but have also provided practical frameworks for managing common resources sustainably and equitably.

Illustrative Examples of Indigenous Communal Traditions

Native American Tribes

Prior to European colonization, many Native American tribes practiced forms of indigenous communism. The Iroquois Confederacy, composed of nations such as the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca, exemplified communal land ownership and decision-making. The Great Law of Peace, which guided the confederacy, emphasized consensus-based governance and collective responsibility. Resources were shared among community members, ensuring the well-being of all.

African Communities

Across the African continent, numerous tribes and communities historically practiced communal living and resource-sharing. For instance, the Igbopeople of Nigeria organized themselves into decentralized village communities known as "umunna," where land and resources were held collectively. Decision-making involved councils of elders and lineage heads, with a focus on maintaining harmony and solidarity within the community.

Pacific Islander Cultures

Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Islands, such as the Māori of New Zealand and the Polynesians tribes, exhibited communal ownership and distribution of resources. Traditional governance structures, like the "Marae" in Māori culture, facilitated collective decision-making and conflict resolution. Practices such as reciprocity, or "Tikanga Māori" underscored the importance of mutual aid and support within the community.

Indigenous Peoples of the Amazon

Tribes inhabiting the Amazon rainforest, including the Yanomami, Asháninka, and Kayapo, have long-standing traditions of communal land management and resource stewardship. These societies operate on principles of kinship and reciprocity, where collective ownership ensures the sustainability of resources and the well-being of future generations. Traditional knowledge systems guide their interactions with the environment, fostering a balanced relationship with nature.