This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
@Imonoz Looking at Kronoskaf reveals a wiki-style setup. It even says: "However, once created, articles (other than those classified as portals) can be freely edited by registered users". This is extremely concerning as far as sources go. Maxx-♥talk and coffee ☕ 16:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there is any discussion that has said that this website is indeed a completely valid and reliable source, then I could not find it. I would like to see if such a discussion has existed, however. As it stands, no matter what their vetting process is, it would still appear to be user-generated content. I would suggest seeing if their sources reflect what has been written (as often should be the case in most wikis). Maxx-♥talk and coffee ☕ 16:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]