Talk:Brendon Burchard

Further reading

What relevance does the Further reading section have to rest of the topic? Kev (talk) 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

It didn't have any relevance. I removed it. Knox490 (talk) 23:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Burchard makes money by teaching people to create "info products" and sell them on the internet. This is the exact thing described in the "Further reading" ref. Unclear to me how neither of you can see this. Are you unaware of what Burchard sells or did you not actually read the further reading article? Jytdog (talk) 00:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Reads like an ad

The tone does not really reflect how BLPs should be written, even though the secondary sources are a good start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiko (talk • contribs) 16:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Is it just me, or does this read like it was written by him?

Is all the information about the awards his book was run really necessary? Especially given the lack of other information, I’d think that the description of his books should be “[book title], released in [year]” for all of the books, if that makes sense, and then something short about the awards they’ve won.

honestly, there’s very little info i can find on him that doesn’t read like an advertisement. Saturniapavonia (talk) 04:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)