Talk:Candle warmer

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 November 2017. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Textiles?[edit]

I don't think this article should be considered a textile arts stub. 192.135.209.8 20:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'm removing it from that category.DroEsperanto 04:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend for deletion[edit]

This article is a terrible stub, it contains no references, is poorly presented and would not meet the notoriety guidelines of any encyclopedia I've read. I'm not a "Wiki" expert so could someone put the correct templates on here and lets fix it of get rid if it. JustinRJoneZ (talk) 08:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is already tagged for lack of references and possible original research. If you believe the article should be deleted, then WP:AFD lists the steps you need to follow to nominate the article for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]