Talk:Folk art/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Frida?[edit]

Frida Kahlo is in the list of notables, but she wasn't a folk artist, rather she drew on Mexican folk traditions to express the personal subject matter of her work. She doesn't really belong in the list. Julia Rossi (talk) 06:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs. 03:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite[edit]

I'll do some basic homework on folk art, like the Bullfinch cited, and try and make a decent article. I'm by no means an expert. The information I added to the introduction is from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/212096/folk-art. It looks like Folk dance and Folk music have their problems too. Hopefully more improvements to come soon.

Rashad9607 (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notables[edit]

I removed the list of notables. Some were not folk artists but researchers, others were artists but not folk artists. Either way, I would like to see those names included contextually in the article and placed in an appropriate list. Also it is my understanding that most folk art is anonymous. Anyways, the list is here, waiting to be worked in.

Rashad9607 (talk) 21:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rashad9607 - I agree the list of notables could be improved, but I would have liked the list to remain in the article until we make those improvements. Iterate and improve. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolfedh (talk • contribs) 02:17, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Names (some names at least) should be included in the article. Should be 'most notable examples' if possible, to aid those who want to see styles/differences etc, or want to start further research. Incidentally I found the article with 3 sections (Antique folk art, Characteristics, Contemporary folk art). The order was not logical (the Characteristics being a general description rather than a follow-on about Antique type), so I'll amend this to (Charact..., Antique..., Contemporary...). Pete Hobbs (talk) 15:22, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definition issues[edit]

I feel like the term "folk art" is a misnomer and one that has been at the heart of the "battle" between folklorists and fine arts scholars - a debate that should be highlighted in the article. To the folklorist, folk arts or traditional arts (see also cultural art) involve the intimate transmission of the artistic form from person to person (this could be within a family or community). Some fine arts scholars have adjusted their terminology, replacing "folk art" with the more appropriate terms "outsider art," "self-taught art" or "naive art." Using "folk art" in the context of this article is outdated and should be amended. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Folk smith (talk • contribs) 16:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on this article, either creating a new article on "American Folk Art" or a chapter within the Folk Art article. I'll draw a lot from Eugene W. Metcalf's essay published in the exhibition catalogue for "Contemporary American Folk, Naive, and Outsider Art: Into the Mainstream? (Miami University Art Museum, Oxford, Ohio 1990) as well as from Paolo Bianchi, especially the chapter on Folk Art in the Kunstforum Outside USA I (1991). Bianchi is calling upon this very problem you are pointing out and recommends to limit the term American Folk Art to popular arts in the US created between roughly 1750-1900 or a little later. will take some time but I'm on it... --VickiAnderson (talk) 08:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article didnt mention if theres a museum devoted just for Americn Folk art?[edit]

Kow, heres are museums throughout he worls devoted to Contempory art, Classical art etc. But is here a central museum of American Folk Art in the U.S.A.? Thanks! Eddson storms (talk) 03:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://download.nos.org/sec225new/Lesson-4.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 10:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Folk art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Folk_art/Archive_1&oldid=1136732687"