Talk:Fortifications of Diyarbakır

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diyarbakır Fortress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article name change[edit]

I've moved the article to the name "Fortifications of Diyarbakir", which is clearer about the article's scope. The name "Diyarbakir Fortress" seems to be merely the term chosen for the UNESCO designation, not necessarily used beyond that context. On its own, it doesn't communicate the scope of this article very clearly, since this article (quite rightly) covers the fortifications of the whole city, not just the citadel. Having spent time in Diyarbakir myself, I couldn't tell what this article was about until I read through it. It's safe to say Diyarbakir is a city, not merely a fortress. The name I've chosen is consistent with equivalent articles elsewhere; e.g. Fortifications of Valletta, Fortifications of Rhodes, Fortifications of Fez, etc. If there are objections, then we can revert the move and go through a WP:RM if needed, but this seemed harmless enough to try a WP:BOLD move. Cheers, R Prazeres (talk) 16:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've also done some subsequent copy-editing and expansion of the article, but these changes are not dependent on the title change. I mostly tried to reduce multiple instances of repetition in the existing material, organized content into more distinctive sections, and added more information on the complex chronology of the construction and reconstructions of the city walls. R Prazeres (talk) 20:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]