Talk:Frances Parthenope Verney

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is such a good example of sloppy research. The Haigh article is not at that link. None of the information in this article can be verified through the ref list. The links to titles are very deceptive and give the impression that you can actually get those sources on the free internet. You cannot. Bostridge is a bonafide source, but page numbers should be cited when you are citing a book that is available only in print or an extremely overpriced ebook.--2603:6011:1D00:4150:5184:2E7:6ABC:1CC1 (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You just make it worse with almost every revision[edit]

Okay, somebody removed Bostridge's source. Are you kidding me? You people really think you are making this thing BETTER? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6011:1D00:4150:C6F:7A1A:3EAB:1260 (talk) 21:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]