Talk:Freedom of religion in Belgium

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Atheism / Untitled[edit]

The article seems to contain euphemisms, e.g. "nonbelievers", or "nonreligious philosophical community". It's perhaps simplifying matters too much, but you could say atheism is treated as "just another religion". If your children go to a state school, the parents are able to choose whether a class marked "religion" will be catholic, non-confessional, or - less common, depending upon where you live - protestant, anglican, islamic, jewish, or orthodox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.225.212.147 (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources now, or delete the page.[edit]

This page uses no sources, the only page that it links to is from possibly the worst source possible on international freedom, the US Department of State, which doesn't tell the truth. I rank this personally on every scale as an F because of no sources. This is too important to not be cleaned up. If this doesn't happen, can an administrator nominate this for deletion ASAP please? Stidmatt (talk) 02:21, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]