Talk:Fulcrum (annual)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Contributors list[edit]

There's really no reason to list the contributors for each issue, and it doesn't really seem consistent with Wikipedia policies, particularly WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I'd suggest changing the section to "major contributors" and trimming the list to the most important (i.e., those who have articles). I'll do this myself in a couple of days, unless there are objections. Chick Bowen 05:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have done this. The list can be reworked or expanded, but again, please don't list the contents of every issue. The full list is here if needed. Chick Bowen 18:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fulcrum 5.jpg[edit]

Image:Fulcrum 5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is Fulcrum even still running?[edit]

I don't believe Fulcrum has printed a new issue since 2007. The website confirms this but gives no details as to why they have stopped. This page clearly needs an update but I don't have the relevant information at hand. Anyone? Joel Collins (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]