Talk:Göcek, Fethiye

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reads like a tourist brochure[edit]

In my opinion, most of this article (including a real estate link that I fixed) is a tourism promotion rather than an encyclopedia article. There are no references (such as, who calls the Gocek coves a "hidden paradise", and who says the harbor is "safe"?). No objective encyclopedia mentions that a town contains "two big grocery shops", so neither should Wikipedia. I don't mind that there is an article for this small city. It's a real place, and there is some economic activity there (mostly tourism). However, the current article is not up to Wikipedia standards. The second half of the article should be deleted outright, and the other half should be rephrased in a more objective tone. GaryGo (talk) 00:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have made some simple copy-editing changes and re-arranged the text a bit in an attempt to avoid repetition and to group related themes together. However, work is still needed, and it does read very much like tourist brochure. There is no reason, however, why there should not be a Wikipedia article about Göcek, and naturally that article will talk about the fact the town is a centre for tourism and boating, but the article needs to be worded more objectively, and some of the information about ordinary amenities (e.g. details about the number of butcher's and grocer's shops) needs to go. I may do some more work on it, if no one objects. Ondewelle (talk) 12:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I do agree that there should be an article for this city, sorry if that was unclear. Thanks for your work! GaryGo (talk) 23:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aegean ?[edit]

According to the sidebox Göcek is in the Aegean Region. But, according to maps it is in Mediterranean Region. (Same is true for the eatern half of Muğla Province). Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Aegean → Mediterranean. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend deletion of link[edit]

I recommend that the link to turkeygo.com/2010/05/gocek.html be deleted. That page adds no value. GaryGo (talk) 19:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of surname link[edit]

User:Martinvl removed a link to a Wiktionary article for surname Gocek, saying, "Why should a Czech surname have any relevance to a Turkish village apart from them having the same spelling?" Because, there is no Wikipedia article for the surname, and "Gocek" is redirected to "Göcek", so it seems like a reasonable compromise to include a link to the Wiki that has the surname info. A WP article for the surname is not likely to be created soon. Göcek remains an unreferenced tourist brochure, and you're worried about the surname link? GaryGo (talk) 17:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Göcek, Fethiye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]