Talk:George Marks, 1st Baron Marks

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on George Croydon Marks, 1st Baron Marks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

George Croydon Marks or George Marks[edit]

8 of the 10 accessible cited references in this article refer to him as George Croydon Marks. The other two refer to him in their house style by initials. None of the cited sources use the shortened form of George Marks. Another editor, with a track record of randomly deleting parts of peoples names has persistently chosen to delete the Croydon bit on pages linked to this article while adding back in an unsourced edit here that he was known as George Marks - he clearly wasn't. Graemp (talk) 19:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have the original edit from User:Tryde, which was part of what looks to be a very well informed edit and has remained the stable position for this page for seven years, until you chose to delete it for no obvious reason. We have no reason to believe that his or her edit was not in good faith. We have Hansard. There is this[1] where he is referred to as "Sir George Marks". We have this[2] from Grace's guide - the leading source of historical information on industry and manufacturing in Britain, which contains the same sentence as we should restore to this article, but is otherwise clearly a piece of research separate from WP. His record at TheyWorkForYou is under the same name. There is also this[3] from a family website, referring to him alternately as Sir George or Baron Marks, with no reference to his middle name. There is this extract from the records of the New Zealand Parliament "Hansard"[4] where he is referred to repeatedly as Sir George Marks. All of which is sufficient supporting evidence to restore the stable version of this page. MapReader (talk) 10:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Croydon Marks, 1st Baron Marks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101002014621/http://www.friendsofbabbacombecliffrailway.org.uk/2.html to http://www.friendsofbabbacombecliffrailway.org.uk/2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]