Talk:Inpainting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Open/free working implementations[edit]

Don't you think something is missing in this article? https://www.nvidia.com/research/inpainting/ Alliumnsk (talk) 08:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see discussion of trateggio? Rose Daly (talk) 21:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible move[edit]

A point that deserves clarification here is that inpainting applies mainly to small regions and is generally used to remove defects, whereas filling in larger regions is generally referred to as object removal. I'm uncertain about the best way to organise these articles. Dcoetzee 01:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inpainting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

I associate inpainting with actually painting, on a surface, not digital manipulation. I know it can include digital manipulation, but an image of inpainting, on a painting, using paint, would be more illustrative Rose Daly (talk) 21:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To clean up, and add citations[edit]

See this section Combined structural and textural inpainting approaches simultaneously try to perform texture and structure filling in regions of missing image information. Most parts of an image consist of texture and structure. The boundaries between image regions accumulate structural information which is a complex phenomenon.[clarification needed (What does it mean that boundaries "accumulate information"?)] This is the result when blending different textures together. That is why, the state of the art inpainting method attempts to combine structural and textural inpainting.

A more traditional method is to use differential equations (such as the Laplace's equation) with Dirichlet boundary conditions for continuity (a seamless fit).[clarification needed (What is a Dirichlet boundary and how does it make something a seamless fit, and what is a seamless fit in this context?)] This works well if missing information lies within the homogeneous portion of an object area. Rose Daly (talk) 21:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Links to Wikipedia articles[edit]

A link to the article about Paintings Conservation is needed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_and_restoration_of_paintings#Inpainting Rose Daly (talk) 10:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citations to be included[edit]

Walsh, Judith (Other)

Evolution in inpainting discussion.

The Book & Paper Group annual 22 (2003), pp. 105-107 American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. Book and Paper Group, Washington DC, United States [English w. English summaries].

The session began with an overview of the recent history of the topic given by Judy Walsh. She presented slides of treatments that required compensation, which were done at the National Gallery of Art over the last 10 years. The discussion that followed was both philosophical and practical. What became clear during the discussion was that conservators LIKE to inpaint, that making works of art "whole" somehow satisfies a profound need, and that conservators try not to succumb to that satisfaction. One conservator described inpainting as a "sugar cookie" for conservators. Several American conservators and individuals trained in Italy, Russia, and England described their philosophy. In the end, inpainting style seems to be totally subjective and client-driven. All conservators claim to do the very best they can (within the confines of their ethics, always finding new ways to get a better result) in order to please their clients--the curators, dealers, and collectors who are the current custodians of the objects.

Abstractor: Author Abstract

AATA No.: 2004-14041 and 38-2778

Primary Classification

G3 - Pigments, paints, and paintings / B5 - History, policy, ethics, theory, and legislation

Index Terms

conservation philosophy / inpainting / National Gallery of Art (Washington DC, United States)

Database: AATA Rose Daly (talk) 10:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Inpainting&oldid=1202075158"