Talk:James Cotterill

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Football: England Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Reaction to sentencing[edit]

This section only contains negative reactions, all of which are from the same source. It also contains the bizarre, contradictary statement "It happens every week in the Premiership and he was made a scapegoat because he was on TV.", which makes no sense because every Premiership match is shown on television. I think that if no balancing statements can be found then this section should be removed from the article, especially as it contains no facts, just opinions. Gasheadsteve 14:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I unquoted the scapegoat on TV part of the quote and can I say these are NOT my views on the incident and I tried to get reactions from both sides, but the only reaction I got was from the NW Evening mail, i'm not sure that there is any comments supporting his sentence, but is there is, please add them but do cite your sources. Kingjamie 19:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a quick look around and I haven't been able to find any positive comments, all of the parties involved have been keeping quiet. I'll rename the section to Criticism of sentencing to reflect the nature of the comments, so that it's clear it's negative opinions rather than a balanced discussion. Gasheadsteve 22:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]