Talk:Kinana

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

[Untitled][edit]

I have removed this:

", and it was a Jewish tribe before converting to Islam after the prophet Muhammad ... "

If Kinanah included the ancestors of the Quraysh, then they were certainly not Jewish before converting to islam.Agger (talk) 13:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agger, is that pure speculation on your part? A number of Jewish tribes have been historically documented to have converted from Judaism to Islam, so I am unable to discern the source of your objection to its inclusion. While the assertion by the original author does not provide a reference for their argument, neither do you. It could be BS or it could be based on some knowledge they had acquired through reading. By deleting the content, we will never know and it is presumptuous to assume otherwise. Is there any valid basis for your assertion? Regards, Steve Stevenmitchell (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article is Unreferenced[edit]

This article is unreferenced. It also appears that the creator of it had little understanding of Wikipedia format and has a very "homespun" flavor to it. While the original author maintains that there are "Reliable References", to reference another participant-written article from within Wikipedia, does not make it a reference. As such, with nearly every reference referring to another article in Wikipedia, this article essentially has no references. The map reconstruction looks to have taken much time but again it seems to be uncertain as to its validity... I will change what I can to bring it more in line with the general Wikpedia format... Stevenmitchell (talk) 00:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banu Kinanah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080403064904/http://www.thearabhistory.com/mudar to http://www.thearabhistory.com/mudar

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]