Talk:Naval weaponry of the People's Liberation Army Navy

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Chinese C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Explorer AUV#Arctic ARV|Arctic class ARV]] The anchor (#Arctic ARV) has been deleted.
[[Explorer AUV#Submerged Dragon 1 AUV|Submerged Dragon 1 AUV]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

I think it might be better to list out weapon systems, rather than putting everything in large-chunk paragraphs? Also, is "maturize" a word? -- Adeptitus 04:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major Revision[edit]

I found so much copyvio stuff and bad layout that I've decided to overhaul the entire article, but it will take a while. I'm wikifying, adding pictures and references, and getting rid of made up words like 'maturize'. --Shrieking Harpy ^Talk^|^Count 18:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy in article name[edit]

I'll freely admit that I have never seen, heard of, or known about the existence of this article before having run across it randomly. However, its name intrigues me. "Naval Weaponry of the People's Liberation Army Navy". It sounds to me an awful like the old joke about the "Redundancy Department of Redundancy". Would it not be better to have it written as "Armaments* of the People's Liberation Army Navy", (* or another similar adjective, such as Weaponry) or perhaps "Naval Weaponry of the People's Liberation Army"? Ourai ^т _с 07:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You could rename it to armaments, I suppose, but the proper name of the navy is the People's Liberation Army Navy. It sounds more inelegant in English than it does in Chinese.--Elar a girl^Talk|Count 16:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Naval weaponry of the People's Liberation Army Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]