Talk:Negative selection (politics)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Negative selection (politics) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Example[edit]

This principle is comparable to a plot twist in bad kung-fu movies: the sensei never teaches the student his very best move, so that if the student ever tries to depose the sensei, he can handily defeat him. Before adding this to the article, however, a concrete example must be found. I can't think of one. Can anyone else? --75.161.84.72 (talk) 09:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think one of the Kill Bill movies — where the technique is the eye-gouging move… Raifʻhār Doremítzwr (talk) 10:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dilbert principle[edit]

This is very similar to Scott Adams's Dilbert Principle based on the description of the article. 128.114.224.237 (talk) 02:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]