Talk:Polycracy
Having the Nazi here is a bad example of original research , unsourced. "Hitler could not have achieved what he did without such support." , i removed this , pure speculation i would say.
Whilst the above is certainly true (and such unsourced assertions are counter-productive), the organisation of the Nazi State under Hitler is commonly accepted to be an example of Polycracy under the guise of Totalitarianism. The delegation of tasks, responsibilities and power to Hitler's subordinates is Historical fact, and has been highlighted by Historians such as Martin Broszat and Hans Mommsen. A better quotation to this effect would probably be;
"Hitler devovled routine administration and party matters to his acolytes", Taken from R Thurlow, 'Fascism', Cambridge University Press, (1999), pg. 44 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.174.207 (talk) 01:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Crap[edit]
This article is ill-defined crap.
If we read https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/polycracy we discover that the definition is "Government by many rulers; polyarchy". So, its not monarchy (or dictatorship, which is just a monarchy you don't like), but its everything else: democracy or aristocracy. So why the bizarre "examples"? William M. Connolley (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)