Talk:Sakyō-ku, Kyoto

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 02:48, May 26, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Districts and municipalities task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

There are lots of inaccuracies and irrelevancies on this page.[edit]

The Daimonji festival is in no way limited to Sakyo-ku, and the information about it should be moved to the correct entry. I'm working on an improved version based on the Japanese page. Tornfalk 08:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

link to Kyoto Protocol information[edit]

I believe the link to "Government of Japan Ministry of the Environment" belongs on the "Kyoto Protocol" page and does not belong on this Kyoto City Ward page.

That seems like a more appropriate place for it. However, I put that in this article in response to a factual challenge. See this edit. So it's here for a reason. That doesn't mean it has to stay; if in your judgment it should be removed or moved, please feel free. At least you know there's a reason for it. Fg2 11:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]