Talk:Sheppey Crossing

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

How high is the Sheppey Crossing?[edit]

Contradicting articles - 35m vs 20m for the height of Sheppey Crossing

Isle of Sheppey article says:

"The Sheppey crossing ... rises to a height of 20 m above The Swale"

This article says:

"The Sheppey Crossing ... crosses The Swale at a height of 35m"

One is nearly double the other.

Both are uncited anyone know which is correct and/or cite source. Carlwev (talk) 11:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BBC reference says 35m. Highways agency reference says 29m. I'm inclined to favour the latter as being a more 'primary' source. Murray Langton (talk) 13:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This Highways Agency post-build review says 35m http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/documents/POPE___A249_Iwade_Queenborough_OYA_report__final.pdf. Good enough for me. danno 21:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]