Talk:Speedcubing
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This article has an unclear citation style. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Technical Writing[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 October 2023 and 1 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brayzn (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Jazaam02 (talk) 19:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Bum[edit]
I got a new world record 2.98 sexond I’m 7 82.16.188.39 (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Yiheng Wang 2x2 Average Ruling[edit]
https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/incidents/98
The WCA has ruled that Yiheng Wang’s recent 2x2 average does not stand due to him not requesting an extra attempt until after he finished the relevant solve and got a time. (Judge lifted cover early) 2600:1014:B1EE:336A:3495:96BF:50AE:C17F (talk) 20:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
ZZ incorrectly listed as "out of favour"[edit]
The current article states (without sources) that the ZZ method is "unfavourable" and "sub-optimal," however, the ZZ method is not only being actively used, it has been developed beyond EOline, and now uses EOCross -> ZZF2L -> ZBLL. Who decided it was abandoned? Why are there no citations? Why describe an old version of ZZ? Vfluorine (talk) 05:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Tsito[edit]
eux ml dix @ 41.77.16.153 (talk) 19:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)