Talk:Tehran Stock Exchange/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Epistemophiliac (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two redlinks, one external link in here. Perseus (t • c) 17:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer:

GA review (see here for criteria)

Great article but three things I think need to updated before it deserves to go from on-hold to approved:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Not a huge problem yet, but the article uses "in recent years" fairly frequently yet data references to 2008 and before - while fine for now, for future proofing may be wise to use "in the years 2002 through 2008..." instead
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Missing a reference in the "Mutual Funds" section
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Self created pictures are nice, personally hard to verify data (I can't read Farsi), but would be great if data in them can be improved (ie:USD-IRR_exchange_rate.JPG) shows data only till 2008 - when you should be able to get more recent data.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Very very close, I'm almost tempted to Be Bold with it

Epistemophiliac (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns seem to be addressed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I think it's a good article now Epistemophiliac (talk) 03:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]