Talk:The Edge of Destruction/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auldhouse (talk · contribs) 23:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pass! Great article and a job well-done.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written. Pass. I did a little copy edit pass and fixed a few quotations and other things.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. Pass.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage. Pass.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. Pass.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable. Pass.Auldhouse (talk) 02:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. Pass. Good explanation of use for image.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass: