Talk:Vertel

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Vertical Telecoms Australia (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm very new to wikipedia and editing it etc - I'm not too sure what this "speedy deletion" notification even means!!!

I'll explain my aim and hopefully someone can help me out. I simply created the page Vertel to allow us to be linked to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_service_providers_of_Australia page ... Vertel is a business which has been a part of the Australia telecommunications industry for some 40 years so does in my view have a valid place on Wikipedia.

Our various counterparts and competitors are all listed under the above referenced category.

Please do let me know the correct process to ensure information about Vertel is listed on Wikipedia and we are able to use our expertise and experience to edit pages for which we have superior knowledge (such as Fixed Networks and Two Way Radio communications).

Many Thanks, Larrisa

I am declining the speedy deletion request as a quick news search for Vertel reveals several hits - this one was the first I found. Here is another. Please do not tag articles for speedy deletion without confirming you can find no coverage in reliable sources whatsoever - you will just annoy and confuse newcomers. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:30, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vertel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130106212305/http://metroethernetforum.org:80/members.php to http://metroethernetforum.org/members.php
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130410001341/http://www.vertel.com.au/blog/mef to http://www.vertel.com.au/blog/mef

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphan article message

Please help this orphan article by adding links to it in related articles and lists. Once it has an incoming link from at least one article or list, the orphan tag can be removed (disambiguation pages, redirects and draft articles do not count). Three or more incoming links are ideal. The Find link tool may help, but not in all cases.

JoeNMLC (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)