User:Epicgenius/NYC short descriptions

Since 2018–2019, I've added short descriptions to hundreds, if not thousands, of articles about New York City-related subjects (mostly locations such as buildings and parks). To simplify things, I usually use one of two short descriptions:

• [Type of location] in Manhattan, New York, etc. swapping out the borough as needed (i.e. Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens, Staten Island). I usually use this short description when the borough is an important piece of information to include in the article.
• [Type of location] in New York City. I use this short description when the borough is unimportant, when the subject covers multiple boroughs or is located citywide, or when it exceeds the 40-character recommendation for short descriptions significantly.

Here are some short descriptions I try to avoid:

1. Any variant where the words "United States" are spelled out in full. The name "United States" is 13 characters; the perfectly acceptable alternative "U.S." is four characters. Since the short description should usually be no longer than 40 characters, you can save 9 characters just by abbreviating the name of the U.S. (or 11 characters if you use "US" instead).
2. [Type of location] in Manhattan, etc. "Manhattan" and other borough names are ambiguous with other localities around the world.
3. [Type of location] in Manhattan, U.S., etc. "Manhattan" and other borough names may still be ambiguous with other localities around the U.S., and "second-level subdivision, country" is not usually how people refer to places in the U.S. It would be jarring, for example, to hear someone say "Los Angeles, U.S.", so we shouldn't say "Manhattan, U.S." either.
4. [Type of location] in Manhattan, New York, U.S., etc. This is much better than either of the two above examples, but I still would not use "[borough], New York, U.S." for brevity. "New York" can refer both to the city and the state (and would be correct in either case). Both are pretty well-known to international readers, and ", U.S." adds six characters that don't clarify anything. However, I don't change short descriptions formatted like this because they aren't technically incorrect, either.
   • For locations in NY state outside NYC (e.g. Buffalo, New York), I use either [Type of location] in Buffalo, New York or [Type of location] in Buffalo, New York, U.S.. In such cases, only the state is correct. For the reason mentioned in (3) above, people do not use "Manhattan, New York City, U.S." because it omits a higher-level subdivision, the state. By contrast, "Buffalo, New York, U.S." is in "city, state, country" format, so it should be fine.
5. [Type of location] in Manhattan, New York (built [date]) - Although WP:SDDATES does say that biographies of non-living people, articles on specific publications, and dated historical events generally benefit from dating, I do not generally think that locations fall under this category. For most structures and places, the date of opening is not the most important information, and adding dates to these short descriptions can fail to take into account places that were closed for a long while.
   • An exception is for demolished or permanently defunct structures and localities, since WP:SDAVOID does recommend avoiding time-specific adjectives like "former", "closed", or "defunct". In such cases I would use [Type of location] in Manhattan, New York ([closed/demolished] [date]). I also use Demolished [type of location] in Manhattan, New York if the structure is completely demolished, since it is unlikely that the structure would ever be rebuilt exactly as it was (any new building on the site would be considered a different structure).
6. [Type of location] in Manhattan, New York City (with or without "U.S." or variants thereof) - As with (4) above, "New York" can refer both to the city and the state (and would be correct in either case). I have seen the argument that "Manhattan", etc. is a subdivision only of New York City, not of New York state, but a borough is a subdivision of the city as well as a county-equivalent of the state. Furthermore, there is only one Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens, or Staten Island in the entire state, so it would not be necessary to distinguish from "Manhattan, Upstate New York" for example.
7. [Type of location] in New York, U.S. - This can be confusing, especially since localities in NY state outside NYC also use this type of short description (in fact, many editors who add "[x] in New York, United States" short descriptions do mean the state, not the city. Thus, this type of short description should be changed if possible.
8. [Type of location] in New York City, U.S. - This is less confusing than the above, but it is also unnecessary because NYC is fairly well-known, so this tends to be tautological. (There is no New York City in the UK, for example.)