User talk:136.2.16.181

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This IP address, 136.2.16.181, is registered to Ford Motor Company and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

July 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Swaminarayan Sampradaya. Apollo1203 (talk) 17:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Swaminarayan Sampradaya. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Apollo1203 (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Vachanamrut, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Apollo1203 (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Apollo1203 (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I didn't blank anything. Knock it off136.2.16.181 (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vachanamrut; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.You have also removed referenced material. Please use the article's talk page to discuss such changes first. Ifnord (talk) 20:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:136.2.16.181 reported by User:Ifnord (Result: ). Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 20:46, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are edit warring across multiple articles and against many editors. Make your arguments on the related talk pages and do not continue to restore your preferred version without consensus.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

136.2.16.181 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for edit warring and will not do it again. I need help with owners of the article trying to control the narrative. The article is so biased. I discussed my points on the talk page. All I am requesting is that a MOD investigate why are sources from BAPS founded 1907 are being used for a group that was found in the 1800's that they themselves broke off from? 136.2.16.181 (talk) 21:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nothing is stopping you from discussing this on the article's talk page. You are just blocked from the articles, which you've already indicated you won't be continuing to edit (because of WP:EW) before the block expires. So, there's no reason to lift the block. Yamla (talk) 21:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.