User talk:2604:3D08:4C7F:DA00:4C1A:810C:E819:88F

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2024 in aviation, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 19:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at 2024 in aviation, you may be blocked from editing. Rosbif73 (talk) 19:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is an existing, inconclusive discussion on Talk:2024 in aviation. The onus is on you to add your point of view to that discussion and wait until consensus is reached before removing the maintenance templates again.

And I also suggest you read WP:PRIVACY and think carefully about your edit summaries. Rosbif73 (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i don't care John not everything is "non-worthy". This was also reverted by some guy and i decided to put it back.

2604:3D08:4C7F:DA00:4C1A:810C:E819:88F (talk) 04:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just decide things unilaterally on wikipedia. You are entitled and even encouraged to make bold edits, sure, but if you are reverted (and especially if reverted by more than one editor) you should discuss the edits before reinstating them, per WP:BRD. Not everything needs to be included in Wikipedia just because it is true or it has made the news. There are hundreds of GA accidents, hundreds of tail strikes, hundreds of minor runway excursions, hundreds of one-engine-out emergency landings with no casualties, and other such run-of-the-mill incidents every year. Truly notable incidents and accidents that meet the criteria of WP:AIRCRASH would be a different matter. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright john go ahead and revert if you really think these are non noteworthy. Also there is a new plane crash with 5 deaths which im guessing is also nonworthy 2604:3D08:4C7F:DA00:4C1A:810C:E819:88F (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also im not trying to vandlize anything here but the article is straight up called 2024 in aviation, i read it as in anything that happens in 2024 in aviation. 2604:3D08:4C7F:DA00:4C1A:810C:E819:88F (talk) 18:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If we were to add anything and everything aviation-related that happens during the year, we'd be left with a useless mess that would interest almost nobody. If we consider the encyclopedic value of what we add, we'll hopefully end up with something useful when we look back on these pages a few years after the event. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]