User talk:2A02:C7E:3011:FC00:6576:2DAC:C57A:471D

April 2023

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

21:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
2A02:C7E:3011:FC00:6576:2DAC:C57A:471D (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

I was responding to an admin then got blocked. What's the reason exactly? 2A02:C7E:3011:FC00:6576:2DAC:C57A:471D (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Beshogur isn't an admin, hence they asked for page protection. You had been edit warring and this IP address range has a history of disruption, so I'd prefer further edits from it to come from registered accounts only. This allows us to selectively permit editing by those who adhere to the policies, and to block the users who don't. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

I was referring to someone talking on a page protection request, not him. Fine, I guess it's edit warring, but who was edit warring, me or him? I gave 3 legitimate sources, 2 from the BBC. You would have to be downright stupid or delusional to believe a country willingly withdrawing from an occupation that successfully ended in 2014 according to Obama, and after signing multiple peace agreements with the Taliban directly is somehow a military defeat. Why do we even have terms like "ceasefire" or "status quo ante bellum" elsewhere if we don't even use them? Please can you tell me who is right in this instance and if I am I'll make an account and open a talk discussion. But it's already been discussed on the Turkish language version and no one there seems to have a problem with it, nor on any of the other language versions where they use the terms "ceasefire", "no outcome", etc. China has withdrawn from conflicts and wars many times yet on their pages it's always called a withdrawal or ceasefire, etc., why the double standards for this war specifically? Why is it so controversial? Is Wikipedia run by the taliban? Like seriously... 2A02:C7E:3011:FC00:6576:2DAC:C57A:471D (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

---