User talk:Antealtares

Ways to improve Community Chickens[edit]

Hi, I'm Mattwheatley. Antealtares, thanks for creating Community Chickens!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi. Is there any more content that could be added? What problems does the magazine try and address?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mattwheatley (talk) 01:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quickville, Kansas[edit]

Please quit changing article from ghost town to former town. Per Ghost town#Definition, there is a very wide meaning for ghost town. On English-Wikipedia, communities in Kansas belong in only one of three groups: City, Unincorporated Community, Ghost Town. Pick one of the three. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 22:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. It literally does not have a single remaining structure or tree. It isn't a ghost town be definition. Antealtares (talk) 01:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Nothing remaining" is lumped together into ghost town groups. That's the way it is. Also, reminder Wikipedia:Etiquette#Principles_of_Wikipedia_etiquette about name calling. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 02:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Quickville, Kansas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

AfC notification: Draft:Manuel Mendoza has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manuel Mendoza. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 08:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coulee Crossroads (TV Show) (February 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references need to be properly formatted as inline citations because the main body of the article is currently completely unreferenced by inline citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coulee Crossroads (TV Show) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antealtares! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Mendoza (March 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manuel Mendoza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 02:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]