User talk:Badbadgerbill

Welcome!

Hello, Badbadgerbill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S iva1979^{Talk to me} 18:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Idlewild edits[edit]

Regarding your edits to the Idlewild article and related articles: Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vclaw 21:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the copyvio tag until the issue has been resolved. Doing so before it is resolved is considered vandalism and is a intentionally encroaching on another's copyright. If you continue to vandalize you may be blocked from further editing. —WAvegetarian•_{_{CONTRIBUTIONS}}^{^TALK}• ^{^EMAIL}•14:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Angus[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. PJM 14:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Roddy Woomble, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —WAvegetarian^TALK_CONTRIBS^EMAIL 15:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 2006[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Sandi Thom, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tyrenius 21:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Nick Tyler[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nick Tyler, by Brichcja (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nick Tyler is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nick Tyler, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Badbadgerbill! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Phil Scanlon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeremy Mills[edit]

The article Jeremy Mills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article should be deleted. It fails the notability requirements established in WP:MUSN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Securel (talk) 20:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Driveblind[edit]

The article Driveblind has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article should be deleted. It fails the notability requirements established in WP:MUSICBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Securel (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Driveblind[edit]

The article Driveblind has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article, band does not seem to meet notability criteria per WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InDimensional (talk) 20:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]