Jump to content

User talk:Batamore/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Batamore, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Batamore! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


A kitten for you!

Hey newbie, keep up good work. Wish to see more concrete contributions from you in times to come.

Diptanshu 💬 20:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Diptanshu Das, thank you :)

Adding to lists

Thanks for reaching out to me and explaining the issue. I have checked the article and approved it. I have taken the liberty to wikilink it from existing pages. I would insist you to add the article Sandy Saha to the following lists:

Diptanshu 💬 20:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Diptanshu Das done. Thank you for your assistance.

A cheeseburger for you!

Wish you all the best. Diptanshu 💬 09:19, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simron Upadhyay has been accepted

Simron Upadhyay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Diptanshu 💬 09:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Wish you all the best.

Diptanshu 💬 09:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Appy Pie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Appy Pie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appy Pie (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS 💬 10:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Simron Upadhyay

Hello, Batamore,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Simron Upadhyay, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 09:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: I had approved the article after checking the notability and references. I have contested the speedy deletion. Diptanshu 💬 10:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
@Diptanshu Das: Please see my comments about sourcing on the talk page. Please note that as a general principle, articles accepted at AfC should be reviewed at NPP by a different reviewer. --John B123 (talk) 10:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
@John B123: I agree. Diptanshu 💬 19:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Joyeeta Roy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joyeeta Roy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 11:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Pranshu Chatur Lal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pranshu Chatur Lal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 07:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Pranshu Chatur Lal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pranshu Chatur Lal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pranshu Chatur Lal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pawan & Pooja has been accepted

Pawan & Pooja, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tajmul Hossain (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
As an elected politician he is notable but the personal and political life sections need sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

KylieTastic Hello, the issue has been solved. I have resubmitted the draft and now you can check and rereview the article Batamore (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tajmul Hossain has been accepted

Tajmul Hossain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Tenses of TV series

Firstly, thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedis, but, unfortunately, I have had to revert a number of recent edits about TV series. As stated at MOS:TENSE "By default, write articles in the present tense, including those covering works of fiction .... and products or works that have been discontinued".
This often causes confusion, so I will try to explain it

Almost certainly, a TV series still exist somewhere, on tape, DVD or whatever medium, so, as it still exists, and could be rebroadcast in the future, we use the present tense "XXX is a TV series". What can be in the past, provided it is complete, is when it was broadcast, "it was originally broadcast on channel Y, from 1998 to 2000".

Please also note the generally accepted past participle is Broadcast, not Broadcasted, which many sources proscribe, as is explained here - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 13:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Looking at your contributions, you have made numerous changes of tense to such articles, I initially only picked up the ones where you added "Broadcasted". Can I leave you to tidy up? or would you prefer me to do so? - Arjayay (talk) 13:31, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Helloo, thank you for the suggestion. MOS:TENSE was not known to me previously that is why i had made those mistakes. I will read the following and edit accordingly. As I don't know how to revert back the changes i will prefer you to tidy up and also i will be very happy if you teach me how to do so. Batamore (talk) 14:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Batamore, reverting the changes will have to be done manually. Go to your contributions list which shows which of your edits are "current". click on the "diff" for the first current edit (if you are using desktop mode, hold "control" while clicking it, so it opens a new tab, (I'd click on 5 or 6 to save returning to the list too often)). Click on undo, then paste an edit summary such as Rv as [[MOS:TENSE]] and save. - Arjayay (talk) 14:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Batamore, I've cleaned up a few more of these but from looking at your contributions it looks like there could be dozens more to go. How are you getting along reverting these? In future, before making changes like this to so many articles, it would be a good idea to do a bit of research into Wikipedia's policies to see if what you're intending to do is consistent with those. — Manticore 01:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashis Marjit has been accepted

Ashis Marjit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 04:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joginder Paul has been accepted

Joginder Paul, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 04:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khagendra Nath Mahata has been accepted

Khagendra Nath Mahata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:05, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jogaranjan Halder (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Jogaranjan Halder instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Jogaranjan Halder
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jogaranjan Halder has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jogaranjan Halder. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:11, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Drop of Blood (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
fails WP:NBOOK
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Drop of Blood (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not meeting WP:NBOOK in this current state.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:18, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

@Nomadicghumakkad: thank you for reviewing my created draft. You have declined my draft and the reason is that the draft is not meeting NBOOK criteria.My question is why my created draft is not meeting the criteria? As i have provided articles from multiple sources like The Hindu(RS) - They reviewed the book,Indulge Express-The article is about the translation of Ek Boond Lahoo Ki translated into A Drop of Blood, Google books, buisness standard,firstpost,scroll.in. I am submitting the draft again. I am requesting you to read those articles again and rereview the draft. Batamore (talk) 18:49, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Batamore, first of all, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia project. The Hindu source is a book review but all others are description of book or details of authors. We need at least two reviews. One is already present, please add another. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

@Nomadicghumakkad: thank you for your reply. If u read the articles carefully you can clearly see that the articles are about the book not the author. Here i am providing you two more articles other than The Hindu article if you read then you can see the article is about the book not about the author. Outlook- https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/joginder-pauls-iconic-urdu-novel-now-in-english/1831982 Business Standard - https://wap.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/joginder-paul-s-iconic-urdu-novel-now-in-english-120051201011_1.html Read those articles carefully and reply me here and let me know when will i submit resubmit the draft. Batamore (talk) 06:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Batamore, the Outlook source is rerun of PTI and hence not independent. Same goes for Business Standard. Please read WP:IS Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:09, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

@Nomadicghumakkad:Thank you for your reply. I am here attaching here one more article other than those which i have already sent you. Here is the article https://www.indulgexpress.com/culture/books/2020/apr/29/joginder-pauls-ek-boond-lahoo-ki-translated-into-a-drop-of-blood-24486.html . What about this article? Is this article also not reliable and so you are not reviewing my created draft? Batamore (talk) 13:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Batamore! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Titodutta (talk) 12:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, Batamore. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 14:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Titodutta (talk) 14:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

  • One new message on the same talk page. --Titodutta (talk) 17:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Dum Dum Dumroo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dum Dum Dumroo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dum Dum Dumroo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eternal Shadow Talk 16:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pati Patni Aur Woh (web series) (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 2pou was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The subject of most sources provided is not actually the series itself, but the actors or director with brief mentions that they are working on the project. Others are not actually independent. The best way to ensure notability is met is to reference some reviews of the show.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
2pou (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bedhab (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No Plot, no Production, no Reception. Draft expansion would be helpful to determine notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Riyana Sukla moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Riyana Sukla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abhishek Mahananda

Notice

The article Abhishek Mahananda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. False narration, he is not an elected member, only a defeated candidate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 06:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thanks for creating Brijmohan Lall Munjal and taking it to DYK. -- Titodutta (talk) 11:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much@Titodutta:. It really means a lot. This will act as an inspiration and boost me to contribute in a better way in Wikipedia. Batamore (talk) 14:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

New message from DiplomatTesterMan

Hello, Batamore. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Brijmohan Lall Munjal.
Message added 07:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DTM (talk) 07:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Brijmohan Lall Munjal

On 5 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brijmohan Lall Munjal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brijmohan Lall Munjal grew Hero Cycles from a parts manufacturer into the world's largest bicycle company? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brijmohan Lall Munjal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brijmohan Lall Munjal), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Karan Aanand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karan Aanand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karan Aanand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flight (2021 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Ayoshi Talukdar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ayoshi Talukdar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:09, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for the edits on RJ Praveen Divineplus (talk) 17:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Joyeeta Roy

Information icon Hello, Batamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joyeeta Roy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled right granted

Hi Batamore, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Titodutta (talk) 02:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

  • Thank you for the autopatrolled right. It will encourage me to contribute to Wikipedia in a better way. I promise to consistently edit on Wikipedia. Batamore (talk) 07:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Pooja Dey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pooja Dey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Dey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for accepting my submitted draft

Hi Batamore thank you for accepting my submitted draft (Shakti Lal Shah). I have created another draft can you please review the draft ? Draft name- Draft:Shweta Rohira Sgloves (talk) 09:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, submit your draft through AFC process. If the subject meets the criteria then me or any other editor will definitely accept the draft and if it does not meet the criteria then it will declined. Batamore (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

  • @Batamore: as you said I have submitted draft for review can you please review the draft ? Sgloves (talk) 11:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Page creations

Hi, I nominated Pranshu for deletion and was looking at other pages you created. Of the 10 or so recent ones I looked at, Uma_(2022_film), Baba_Baby_O will only be released next year. Nirbhaya_(2021_film) released a month ago but has only two sources - one "Poster release" PR, other two para interview. Ekannoborti sources are all actor interviews. Same for this director Suparn Verma. For this book The_Rule_Breakers, one is author interview, another specifically "micro" review.

Of the sources you used to get Pranshu page recreated here, ToI one seemed promotional (also see WP:TOI), the other was a blog of a marketing firm masquerading as a newspaper.

My request is, please do go through WP:RS and WP:PRIMARY. Just being hosted on Indian Express or Hindu websites doesn't automatically make that content reliable. And there is really no hurry to create pages for unreleased films, see WP:TOOSOON. Hemanthah (talk) 05:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

@Titodutta: can I request inputs from you here? Also see Talk:Abhishek_Mahananda, which was created as page of an elected member, but corrected later as a lost candidate after somebody prod-ed it. Hemanthah (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the ping. Yes, PRs should not be cited. Some of the film articles mentioned above have available sources. It needs some more work to find sources from English and Bangla/{subject_language}. For example: Nirbhaya, doing a quick Google search I see sources such as 1, 2 (Google Translate works for Bangla). About WP:TOOSOON, it is an essay. We need to see what is the status of a movie: shooting started, shooting completed, post-production completed, to be released, released etc. If a film's post-production is completed/release date is announce, we need to see it against the criteria of WP:NFILMS, and that's how upcoming film articles such as List of Bollywood films of 2022 are created. Over-all I think it would be good to spend some more time to further expand the articles. --Titodutta (talk) 06:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
    Rather than examining the notability of the articles here, @Titodutta:, I'd like your thoughts about the editor's choices of sources. I pinged you since you granted them autopatrol. The sources they've added indicates to me that they do not understand WP:RS all that well. Do the Abhishek Mahananda, Pranshu Chatur Lal etc pages show they can continue to bypass NPP? Hemanthah (talk) 08:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Hello, thanks for the message. In the last message, you made a list of articles, and pinged me. Anyway, I see scope of improvement (the message related to PR is conveyed), but I clearly don't see major alerts at this moment and don't find reasons to believe that the editor completely fails to understands RS. While I agree with the observations on the Abhishek Mahananda article, over-all I don't see major issue right now. --Titodutta (talk) 09:51, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
    My message clearly was about sourcing, but you chose to address only the peripheral WP:TOOSOON part. And again, I never said they "completely" fail to understand, only that they need to pay more attention and can do with more oversight, not less. The whole AfC thing is there to guide, and autopatrol deprives them of opportunities for feedback.
    But since you appear to be not interested in following what I actually said, I'll stop here. Hemanthah (talk) 10:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Do not assume that I am not interested! What I told is: is there any scope of improvement? — yes. Is there an immediate alert? — over-all I don't think so right away. --Titodutta (talk) 10:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Pranshu Chatur Lal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pranshu Chatur Lal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pranshu Chatur Lal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hemanthah (talk) 18:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

  • @Hemanthah: Hello, I checked that you have nominated Pranshu Chatur Lal for deletion. Let me tell you one thing, that this article was previously deleted through AFD. After that when new coverages came, I requested to the Admin @Premeditated Chaos: who had previously closed the AFD discussion as DELETE. She checked everything and then only she had undeleted the article. The article is clearly passing WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN. So i think and i request you to check the previous discussions.Thank You Batamore (talk) 07:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
    I did and I have linked to it down below. I wouldn't characterise that discussion the way you are doing. It was undeleted with the understanding that you'll add better sources. The sources you added - Kolkata Mail - was from a marketing agency as I've said. (It'd be better if you reply in this section below so that discussion is in a single place). Hemanthah (talk) 08:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
  • I was not aware that Kolkata Mail was PR/unreliable, or I would never have undeleted the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
*Hi @Premeditated Chaos: As you said Kolkata mail is a press release, Can you please let me know how to identify? It will help me to work better in other articles as well. Thank you. Batamore (talk) 07:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
  • I've replied at the AfD; no need to split the discussion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Kapil Tiwari

In Kapil Tiwari, a stub which you moved to article space now, you write that he's a doctor of medicine and categorised it as such. Is there any source for that? It appears to be a doctorate degree, like Ph D; not that he practices medicine? Hemanthah (talk) 08:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

  • Indeed, it seems to be a PhD degree holder, and not a medical practitioner. I am removing that part, until a reliable source is found that shows Tiwari is a medical practitioner. --Titodutta (talk) 07:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bedhab

Information icon Hello, Batamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bedhab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manoj Nair

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manoj Nair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Nair. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 21:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pati Patni Aur Woh (web series)

Information icon Hello, Batamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pati Patni Aur Woh (web series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for your tireless contributions

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your tireless contributions in creating and updating new articles Diptanshu 💬 17:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Another barnstar for you

The Real-Life Barnstar
For mentoring the interns participating in Wikipedia Medical Editing Internship and for proving yourself to be a leader. Diptanshu 💬 17:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Inform

Hi , Batamore I've have seen you have done many pages but didn't disclose your gender that who you are ? And what you are ? Also you didn't make your user page so make your user page and disclose it , Thanks. 2409:4060:211C:8086:0:0:66A:60B0 (talk) 05:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bedhab

Hello, Batamore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bedhab".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Review the draft

Hello hope you are doing well. I had created an article named Arham Abbasi which was deleted previous day and the reason was G4. And the admin User:Justlettersandnumbers who deleted the page suggested me that the article is better then the previous one and he/she told me to expand and submit the existing draft (Draft:Arham Abbasi) which has been created already by an another edit. I have expanded the draft and now I have selected the draft for review. So I will be thankful if you check and review the draft. Thank you in advance. Trakinwiki (talk) 05:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Trakinwiki: Hello, I saw your created draft. Can you please tell me why the subject is notable? Also I would like to suggest you to expand and elaborate the career section of the article and also make some substantial changes as editors have suggested you. Batamore (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Batamore the subject is passing wp:nactor. And wp:gng. And as you said I have expanded the career section with proper reason. The subject is notable cause he has started his career and also got fame with the MTV show called Webbed. In 2017 he has played a role named Sahil Qureshi in the film Game Over where he played the parallel lead role. In 2022 he has acted in a web series named Prayag where he played the lead role. In the same year he has completed 1 year on the TV Imlie, where he is playing a important character. I hope you have understood why the subject is notable. So if you think the subject is notable then you can review otherwise you will give some valuable comment on it. Thanks Trakinwiki (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Did you see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Arham_Abbasi from January 2022? Ravensfire (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
@Trakinwiki: Hello, i have read the draft Arham Abbasi and i have seen that you have made some substantial changes and elaborated the article. I think the subject meets WP:NACTOR.So i have accepted the draft and moved it to the main space. I will suggest you to edit the page further. Batamore (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello User:Ravensfire, thank you for your message. No, I did not note the AFD discussion. I have thoroughly studied the draft, the references, and added my inputs and suggestions to improve the draft. I would be happy to learn from your experience. Thank You Batamore (talk) 18:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
No worries! This article has had some interesting history and puffery (describe a minor role as lead). I can't tell if it's just a fan editing, or if there's some paid editing happening here. I think it's still a borderline article with probably one significant role and questionable after that. For example "completed 1 year on the TV Imlie, where he is playing a important character" - but nothing to help demonstrate that importance, and the show article just lists them in the cast. So how would a reader know they are important? Not sure on the right step forward for this. Perhaps just tag it for notability and needs sources and this will be another stub level article on minor Indian actor. Ravensfire (talk) 21:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:A Drop of Blood

Hello, Batamore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "A Drop of Blood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ujjal Bhuyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Government Law College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sushovan Banerjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MLA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Drafts

I would suggest that you not move drafts into the mainspace yourself, and instead run them through AFC. The drafts do not establish that the persons are notable as defined by Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Yes definitely. Thank you for your suggestion. As you said, I will definitely go through AFC process. Batamore (talk) 15:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angana Roy (Bengali actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Partha Pratim Sengupta

Information icon Hello, Batamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Partha Pratim Sengupta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Soma Sankara Prasad

Information icon Hello, Batamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soma Sankara Prasad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Baldev Prakash (banker) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baldev Prakash (banker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldev Prakash (banker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thesixserra (talk) 02:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Avinash Kaul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avinash Kaul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avinash Kaul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thesixserra (talk) 10:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Anupam Mittal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anupam Mittal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anupam Mittal (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 04:26, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Partha Pratim Sengupta

Hello, Batamore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Partha Pratim Sengupta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Soma Sankara Prasad

Hello, Batamore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Soma Sankara Prasad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Batamore/Archive_1&oldid=1214729508"