User talk:BigSugarDaddy

Proposed deletion of Adalya Artside[edit]

The article Adalya Artside has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no reliable sources that are independent of the hotel itself. If we consider it an organization or company, it's eligible for speedy deletion; as a building it's not; thus going a somewhat slower route. I didn't find any additional useful sources in a Google News search, and only booking portals and the like in a Google Web search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 18:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Huon! Sorry, if I did something wrong! I saw this page first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hotels_in_Turkey_by_city. This page is not created by me. I am sure that wikipedia have to have more Turkish hotels on this page, but I am novice, and that is why I am asking help. Anyway, Turkey has many hotels, and I think that many of them are notable hotels. It is just impossible to put all things in the article immediately. And I want to assure you that I didn't want to promote this particular hotel. :)

It seemed to me that the more hotels we have in wikipedia the better. That is all. BigSugarDaddy 18:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on the article's talk page. Let's keep the discussion in one place. Huon (talk) 18:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adalya Artside Hotel.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adalya Artside Hotel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oshakati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pepper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khama Rhino Sanctuary has been accepted[edit]

Khama Rhino Sanctuary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-neutral references[edit]

Hello BigSugarDaddy, By chance I recently came by the article about the Khama Rhino Sanctuary you created. I noticed that you base the entire article on sources influenced by the subject itself, which can possibly not be neutral. For certain facts those sources are useful (e.g. an creation date), but for others they should be backed up with neutral sources with no direct connection to the reserve (e.g. statements about the rarity of rhinos). I went looking in your contributions-list and found several articles where you used similar, untrustworthy references. This included websites of the subjects themself, but also travel-websites. What they had in common is that they don't cite enough sources to back up certain statements.

I would advice you to take a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources . In case you still need help I would advice you to contact an admin, as they have much more experience in both explaining and doing this stuff. Further I want to say that nevertheless I appreciate your energy put into contributing to wikipedia.Jarne Colman (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jarne Colman, hello! Yes, I understand, that it would be much better if I put neutral references in the article. But this rhino sanctuary is both quite new and quite small, and it is hard to find such kind of references. What I can assure you, that I did my best. It will be very good If someone else add these references to the article. Regards, BigSugarDaddy 06:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that if you cannot find such neutral, third-party references for a subject, it may not be notable, and thus the subject may not warrant its own article. No subject deserves an article merely because it exists. Note that sources do not need to be in English (see WP:NONENG), but they should still be reliable, for example books, magazines, or newspapers with a reputation for fact-checking and an editorial process. See WP:SOURCE and WP:NOTRELIABLE for ideal and poor sources. Also, 1992 is not "quite new". --Animalparty! (talk) 06:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tünektepe Cable Car (May 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Tünek Tepe. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tünektepe Cable Car and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tünektepe Cable Car, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BigSugarDaddy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please upload free images to Commons.[edit]

Thank you for uploading free images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view your previous uploads). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!

Also, please give some thought to writing better descriptions of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Where did you take the picture? What is in it? The photographs you upload might eventually be used in multiple different articles or projects. For example File:A rhinoceros.jpg is a very vague title (there are five living species of rhinoceros), and the description "A rhino" is both redundant and uninformative. The only clue to where this photograph may have been taken is that you added the photo to Khama Rhino Sanctuary. If the photo gets removed from the article, that clue is lost. A more helpful descriptive (or title) might be "White rhinoceros in Khama Rhino Sanctuary, photographed in 2017", which would allow other people looking for images of white rhinoceroses, and/or animals from the Khama Rhino Sanctuary or Botswana, to more easily find and use the image. I have moved File:A Zemba woman.jpg to Commons, but without more complete description, I cannot confidently categorize the file into anything narrower than Category:Women of Africa. The good news is that it's very easy to edit file descriptions to add details (changing file names is done less often). If you have any questions on editing or uploading, you can ask at the Help desk, the Teahouse, or type {{help me}} here on your Talk page, and someone will answer your question shortly. Cheers! --Animalparty! (talk) 06:54, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, --Animalparty!! Okay. :) BigSugarDaddy 07:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, BigSugarDaddy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:The statue of Lalith William Samarasekera Athulathmudali.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:The statue of Lalith William Samarasekera Athulathmudali.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ronhjones ! I have pointed the source of the statue. BigSugarDaddy 09:40, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The statue of Lalith William Samarasekera Athulathmudali.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The statue of Lalith William Samarasekera Athulathmudali.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:20, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Adalya Artside elevators.jpg[edit]

The file File:Adalya Artside elevators.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic and unused file

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 47.151.26.64 (talk) 00:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]