User talk:Bravehm

Welcome!

Hi Bravehm! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Victuallers (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Bravehm (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hazaras. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I really did not read your comment correctly. Sorry! Bravehm (talk) 07:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hazaras, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TomStar81 (Talk) 00:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bravehm. Thank you for your work on General Musa Khan. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 01:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

@Voorts: Thank you so match. Bravehm (talk) 01:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

No problem. Happy editing. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Bravehm, you have violated WP:3RR. The only reason I'm not blocking you is because you were not warned before the 4th revert. However, you must revert your last edits; otherwise, I will block you.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Bbb23: They always rejected even my first edit on Hazaras article, and has taken a tough stand against me. While I have the right as they have. They accused me of having sock accounts for no reason, which is an inappropriate kind of treatment. Bravehm (talk) 00:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

If you don't want to be blocked, I suggest you self-revert (quickly, before it's too late). M.Bitton (talk) 00:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

I did the same thing brother. Bravehm (talk) 00:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Does that mean you don't want to self-revert? M.Bitton (talk) 00:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Why do you mean I didn't? Bravehm (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

This is the edit that you need to self-revert. This is my last comment. M.Bitton (talk) 00:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the help M.Bitton. Bravehm already reverted himself with that edit. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

@HistoryofIran: thanks and apologies to Bravehm. I obviously misread the diff (I really shouldn't edit while intoxicated). M.Bitton (talk) 00:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Removal of sourced info.[1] or [2]--Bravehm (talk) 01:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:BOOMERANG. I tire of your manipulating pov-pushing WP:NOTHERE behaviour. Because you are embarrassed by getting exposed for your disruptive edits, does not mean you will be able to throw me under the WP:ASPERSIONS bus. The word Hazara appears zero times in the Nozhat al-Qolub by Hamdallah Mustawfi, which has been translated by Guy Le Strange [3] - a page 415–16 doesnt even exist. And we have already been through about the bit regarding Mousavi [4]. And for good reason, because the word "Hazara" first appears much later, in the 16th-century [5]. In other words, my removals were valid, as they were not based on my personal feelings - contrary to you. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Also note that Bravehm has now started edit warring elsewhere [6]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

You did this to trap me, no this time I will not edit warring, now I'm more alert. Bravehm (talk) 01:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I forced you to make that disruptive edit through my mind controlling powers. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Sourced information about Hazaras is always fanatically removed.[7] Review and undo any edits I make, I don't edit warring.--Bravehm (talk) 01:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

More proof you are WP:NOTHERE. The info was literally not supported by the sources, you have just been told this. Its not rocket science. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)