User talk:Editor MVM

March 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Roundish. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more of your recent additions to the page Chattampi Swamikal because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the List of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Roundish ⋆t c) 17:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mannathu Padmanabha Pillai[edit]

Your edits in the article on Mannathu Padmanabha Pillai. All of these edits are either eulogizing in nature or irrelevant. Please note that honorifics (titles like Mr., Sree, Acharya) are not used in Wikipedia. As such, I have reverted all those edits.--jojo@nthony (talk) 04:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mannathu Padmanabha Pillai. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please do not add unencyclopedic content jojo@nthony (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Stylez995 (talk) 17:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for persistent disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GabberFlasted (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]