User talk:FSeg500

April 2023

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Which reference was problematic? FSeg500 (talk) 13:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Both of the cites you've added so far. We can't use blogs, vendor sites, or other sorts of content marketing. MrOllie (talk) 13:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

What about an SDS for a product? FSeg500 (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

What about this reference? FSeg500 (talk) 14:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Press releases are also unusuable. SDS aren't independently published. Please read the guideline on reliable sourcing and if you still have questions after that, follow up at WP:TEAHOUSE. MrOllie (talk) 14:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)