User talk:JJonahJackalope/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Atlanta sit-ins

Hi JJonahJackalope. Would you consider adding Atlanta sit-ins to your list of articles to create?

I'm trying to compile a list of articles to create for Atlanta that are relevant to the civil rights movement. I've already added Atlanta's Berlin Wall. If you have any suggestions, then please add them to Template:CRM in Georgia. That template is for events only. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 06:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

@@Mitchumch: Thanks for the recent editing to the Atlanta's Berlin Wall page. As for the Atlanta sit-ins, I'm definitely interested, but unfortunately it might be a while until I get to creating it (I have a few pages I wanted to tackle first, plus some irl stuff). I'll let you know when I start on it though, and if I do any other CRM-related pages, I'll be sure to add them.--JJonahJackalope (talk) 04:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!...

... for your recent article creations related to public art. Great work! Happy editing, ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Another Believer: Thanks for the compliment, happy to help, and right back at you with your editing! JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ivory Lee Young

Hello, JJonahJackalope. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ivory Lee Young".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 19:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1985–86 Hormel strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1985–86 Hormel strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 10:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1985–86 Hormel strike

The article 1985–86 Hormel strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1985–86 Hormel strike for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 17:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Sidney Lanier Monument

I've been noticing your good work on Georgia topics. You just listed Sidney Lanier Monument as a Confederate Memorial. Is it really a Confederate memorial? Yes, Sidney Lanier was a private in the Confederate Army who was captured, but the memorial is because he was a poet. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bubba73: Thanks for the compliment. As far as classifying the monument, I think it's certainly debatable whether or not it is a fully-fledged Confederate monument or not, but included that designation on account of it being mentioned in several sources alongside other Confederate monuments in the city (like the AJC article and the Atlanta History Center report) and based on a similar classification for the Four Southern Poets Monument, which also features four former Confederate individuals more well-known for their poetry than their contributions to the CSA. If you want to discuss this further in the talk page for the article and try to get a consensus though, I wouldn't be opposed, just justifying why I classified it as I did. JJonahJackalope (talk) 04:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
I didn't see anything on the monument that says it is there because of his minor service in the Confederate Army. Here in Brunswick we have the Lanier's Oak. It is named that because that is where he wrote some of his poetry, not because of the Confederate Army. Just a short distance from there, up US 17, is the Sidney Lanier Bridge. It is named that because of his poetry near that location. If his service as a private were his main claim to fame, there would not be any of these memorials to him or things named for him. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
@Bubba73: I definitely see your point, but at the same time, I think there definitely exists a gray area between what is clearly defined as a "Confederate monument and memorial" on this website. For instance, from the lead of the List of Confederate monuments and memorials in Georgia page, it says, "This is a list of Confederate monuments and memorials in Georgia that were established as public displays and symbols of the Confederate States of America (CSA), Confederate leaders, or Confederate soldiers of the American Civil War." (emphasis added). By this definition, a monument honoring Lanier could technically be classified as a Confederate monument, and just from a quick search, I've found a few pages of things honoring him that are classified under "Confederate monument and memorial", such as the aforementioned Four Southern Poets Monument and the Sidney Lanier High School in Alabama. I agree with you that he is more well-known for his post-Civil War activities than his career as a private, but at the same time, I think this is more of an issue with list criteria pertaining to Confederate monuments and memorials in general. Would you mind if I made a post on Talk:List_of_Confederate_monuments_and_memorials about this topic to seek some clarity on pages for monuments of individuals whose relation to the CSA may not be their most notable defining characteristic? I would love to have further input on this topic. JJonahJackalope (talk) 13:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
I mentioned Sidney Lanier over there 2-3 years ago, and I don't think it did any good. A hothead basically dictates that article. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 16:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
@Bubba73: Yeah, I went back through the archives a little bit ago, think I see what you're talking about:

Talk:List_of_Confederate_monuments_and_memorials/Archive_4#Do_these_people_merit_inclusion? Based on the fact that this was from several years ago and it doesn't seem like it concretely resolved issues related to monuments and memorials of people associated with the CSA, I'll try to open a new discussion on the talk page. I definitely feel like this is a gray area affecting a few articles of the sort and it should be clarified with further discussion. I have no problem taking away the Confederate monument tag from the Sidney Lanier Monument, but if that's the case, there are a few other pages that would also need editing that I'll bring up in the talk page for the list. JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm no fan of Sidney Lanier. I tried to read some of his poetry in grade school but found it unbearablely dull. When I was discussing this on the talk page of that article a few years ago, I think I got some support from other editors but I think some were viciously opposed. I still feel the same about Lanier (and there may be others like him, I don't know), but I don't feel like getting into that debate again. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1105 West Peachtree.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1105 West Peachtree.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Megaplex (convention) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Megaplex (convention). Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 21:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1985–86 Hormel strike

The article 1985–86 Hormel strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1985–86 Hormel strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Congrats on the GA! Just to add to the note, it's def worth doing a DYK for it as well, if you want to. I see you've already done several so you know the process. All the best, Mujinga (talk) 11:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nathanael Greene Monument, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Tread on Me.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Confederate Defenders of Charleston you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 17:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

The article Confederate Defenders of Charleston you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Confederate Defenders of Charleston for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 19:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

The article Confederate Defenders of Charleston you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Confederate Defenders of Charleston for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 22:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Confederate Defenders of Charleston, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sword and shield and Assault and battery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James Oglethorpe Monument

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article James Oglethorpe Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 66.103.58.199 -- 66.103.58.199 (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Porcupine Freedom Festival

On 1 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Porcupine Freedom Festival, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Porcupine Freedom Festival has been described as "the libertarian version of Burning Man"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Porcupine Freedom Festival. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Porcupine Freedom Festival), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for 1985–86 Hormel strike

On 4 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1985–86 Hormel strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1985–86 Hormel meatpacking plant strike was the subject of both an Academy Award–winning film and a stage play by the Children's Theatre Company? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1985–86 Hormel strike. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1985–86 Hormel strike), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James Oglethorpe Monument

The article James Oglethorpe Monument you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:James Oglethorpe Monument for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 00:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of James Oglethorpe Monument

The article James Oglethorpe Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:James Oglethorpe Monument for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for James Oglethorpe Monument

On 9 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Oglethorpe Monument, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before Daniel Chester French and Henry Bacon designed the Lincoln Memorial, they collaborated on the James Oglethorpe Monument in Savannah, Georgia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Oglethorpe Monument. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, James Oglethorpe Monument), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atlanta's Berlin Wall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Atlanta's Berlin Wall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 18:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atlanta's Berlin Wall

The article Atlanta's Berlin Wall you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Atlanta's Berlin Wall for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 21:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

NRHP article(s)

Hi, i just came across article Zion Baptist Church (Marietta, Georgia) which you created mid-2020, because while it happens to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the WikiProject NRHP banner had not been added to its Talk page, so it showed up in an exceptions list. Thanks for creating it! And i see on your userpage that you have created many more articles on historic places in Georgia and some elsewhere. Including in the Atlanta area...where I have recently been developing a few articles myself. I am a longtime editor of NRHP articles. I wonder, are you aware of resources at wp:NRHPHELP (and wp:NRHPHELPGA for Georgia specifically)? Including about the "NRHP infobox generator tool", at http://www.elkman.net/nrhp. And including about getting the great NRHP inventory/nomination/registration documents. Please feel free to use those resources, and please consider joining and/or posting anytime at WikiProject NRHP (shortcut wt:NRHP to its Talk page). Feel free to be in touch with me, too, anytime...I'll watchlist here but if I don't notice a reply here please reach me at my Talk page. Anyhow, glad you're on board, and keep up your good work! --Doncram (talk) 05:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

P.S. On that article, I was just able to add this NRHP document reference:[1]

References

  1. ^ Kenneth H. Thomas, Jr. (April 23, 1990). "National Register of Historic Places Registration: Zion Baptist Church / Old Zion Baptist Church". National Park Service. Retrieved January 9, 2021. With accompanying seven photos

which provides a lot more detail that you might consider using to expand the article. cheers, --Doncram (talk) 05:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

One thing about using that info box generator - the coordinates very often need to be corrected. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

US labour disputes articles

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for creating a significant number of new articles on US labour disputes!--Goldsztajn (talk) 10:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)


Organized labour project

Thank you for joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's user space without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Goldsztajn Sorry for the late reply, but first of all, thanks for the barnstar, and second of all, sounds like a good plan! I have no objections to the membership file idea, and thanks for your help with the Wikiproject in general. Seems like it's been more active lately, and I'm looking forward to improving the preexisting articles and creating good new ones. Thanks, -JJonahJackalope (talk) 19:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Atlanta's Berlin Wall

The article Atlanta's Berlin Wall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Atlanta's Berlin Wall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 04:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Thomas Gallaudet Memorial

Since we are both working in the same area, I just wanted to give you a heads up that I am pulling stuff together for the Thomas Gallaudet Memorial -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 04:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Guerillero Sounds good, thanks for the heads up and best of luck on it! -JJonahJackalope (talk) 06:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Tech unions Editathon

Hey JJonahJackalope, I just wanted to mention that there's currently an Editathon planned involving WP:LABOUR that you might be interested in: The Tech Worker Coalition wants to improve the coverage of unions and unionisation in the technology sector from February 19 to 21. There's already quite a list of things to do, but few people to do them. If you're interested, drop by! Shushugah (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Equestrian statue of Charles Devens you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 23:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

The article Equestrian statue of Charles Devens you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Equestrian statue of Charles Devens for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The article Equestrian statue of Charles Devens you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Equestrian statue of Charles Devens for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2020 Michigan graduate students strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The article 2020 Michigan graduate students strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2020 Michigan graduate students strike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Statue of John Brown Gordon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Statue of John Brown Gordon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison

On 5 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the horse in the equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison has stirrups, but no saddle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Statue of John Brown Gordon

The article Statue of John Brown Gordon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Statue of John Brown Gordon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations

Your DYK hook about the equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison drew 5,860 page views (488 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of March as shown at Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics#March 2021. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Civil War Memorial (Savannah, Georgia) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 15:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Civil War Memorial (Savannah, Georgia) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Civil War Memorial (Savannah, Georgia) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 16:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Civil War Memorial (Savannah, Georgia) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Civil War Memorial (Savannah, Georgia) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 20:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Megaplex (convention)

Information icon Hello, JJonahJackalope. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Megaplex (convention), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)