User talk:Jageshwar
Talk page access has been revoked due to multiple invalid unblock requests. If you wish to appeal further you will need to contact WP:BASC by emailing them directly. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
| ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mr Jagesshwar You do bad things just to damage iimsam, please stop changing the facts about IIMSAM.
Mr. Homoudy113, I hope you are aware that you are putting an information which can be termed as blatant lie. For example, on what basis are you calling Remigio Maradona the Secretary General of IIMSAM. Why would any respected organisation appoint a Secretary General against whom larceny and fraud are alleged ? It has to be person of extraordinary talent especially if the person is not from a country that is a Member State of IIMSAM. Please do not be judgmental about facts and take them as they are. What if someone says that that the so-called ombudsman of IIMSAM does not have a university degree ? I would ask you to check the facts.
Welcome![edit]
July 2009[edit]
Disambiguation link notification[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC) Problems with upload of File:IIMSAM Conference Amman, Jordan.jpg[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IIMSAM Conference Amman, Jordan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC) File source and copyright licensing problem with File:IIMSAM's Spirulina Nutritional Initiatives, Mexico, 2011.jpg[edit] Thanks for uploading File:IIMSAM's Spirulina Nutritional Initiatives, Mexico, 2011.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:IIMSAM in --Mexico--, 2011.jpeg[edit] A tag has been placed on File:IIMSAM in --Mexico--, 2011.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 08:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC) IIMSAM[edit]
December 2012[edit]
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: CISRI LEGAL DEPARTMENT regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC) Nomination of Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization for deletion[edit] The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intergovernmental Renewable Energy Organization until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. L.tak (talk) 18:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)  {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Acroterion (talk) 04:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply at Talk:Casualty (series 27)[edit]
Your recent edits[edit]
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IIMSAM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elissa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC) June 2013[edit] {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 12:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Dear Acroterion, I disagree with your lofty assumptions and interpretations. However, you are free to have them. Well, Media did claim Sulaiman Al Fahim to be a founder. Whether he is or is not is for the appropriate authorities to decide. Since it was claimed by Media, what is wrong in terming it as 'media claimed founder.' Losing almost 80 places in three years, infact, 79 places in three years. Shall it not be called a rapid downward slide or do you think nosedive or freefall is a better word. While the matter of ranking is very clear, however, if you read carefully, my additions said 'the claims made by Arabian Business about Al-Fahim need to be professionally validated.' Arabian Business did confer Sulaiman Al-Fahim with the title of 'Doctor' which was denied by his own representative Ivo Illic Gabbara. Hence, there is a humble request to validate the claims as having an increasing global footprint and having a freefall in ranking as most powerful Arab are mutually exclusive. About IIMSAM, prominent sources such as the UN, Fox News who did a diligent report on IIMSAM, Remigio Maradona's own website, news reports in the Press with proper references have been provided. Shall providing correct information not be on one's agenda along with refraining from smoking in public places, voting in elections, and safe sex to protect against HIV/AIDS. This is my opinion. However, another editor like you are free to have their own opinions but please refrain from raping the correct information which is properly sourced. Paucity of time makes me focus on selective subjects, however, as an average human has a vocabulary of 35,000 words; in the due course of time, I shall try to increase my topics of interest to 15,000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jageshwar (talk • contribs)
What is very unfortunate is that you are not following what you are suggesting; and have applied yourself to vandalism by not being objective. You removed my addition of the Arabian List 2013. Going by your action, does one construe that the biography is not of a living person; and hence you deleted the most recent addition of 2013. This seriously questions your intention. The second instance is about the newsreport in the Spanish Media about the Valencia Football Club or about the person being the Sheikh etc. Did you go through the news reports from reputed Spanish newspapers and the links that I had added ? You could have used google translator to comprehend what it actually said rather than going for action before comprehension. But being judgemental rather than being objective is much easier for many blokes like you who do not apply themselves, but immediately involve in cyber arson.Or there is a particular reason for it that you might be better aware of?
 Jageshwar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: The blocking by Acroterion is highly arbitrary. For example, he cites poorly sourced biographical information and commentary. How can an information that is procured from the same source can be poor. In this case, it refers to the references drawn from Arabian Business magazine. The one that was there was for 2009 while I added from the year 2013. More so, how can the information which is drawn from the official websites or the news reports about the person in reputed media publications can be termed poorly sourced. Hence the action by Acroterion was deliberate, arbitrary and mischevious. Therefore, I request an immediate unblock from the administrator Decline reason: Since none of the above requests (which I have merged into one template for convenience) addresses the reason for your block, and in fact indicate that you intend to continue flouting Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, I am declining your unblock request. I am also increasing the time limit to indefinite; you will be unblocked once you are able to show an understanding of why you were blocked and give concrete assurances that you will comply with this website's policies in the future. Yunshui 雲水 09:45, 7 June 2013 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Jageshwar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This is regarding the block by Yunshui about biography of living persons. How can it be justified when the information added by me as Sporadic 2013 is still existant on the wikipedia page? The concerned addition made to the page were seemed fine to Acroterion who had initially blocked me and for reasons I consider frivolous, though I am not a big fan of the person's ability as an administrator and for the reasons duly provided in my explantion. How can the same addition by me as Sporadic2013in the biography of a living person be interpreted in two exactly opposite manners by two different administrators viz. Acroterion and Yunshui. It shows there is a serious lack of the standardization of paramateres / benchmarks as far as administrators are concerned. Though Acroterion is there on wikipedia for a long time, I have no idea of Yunshui Decline reason: This is not an unblock request - and is certainly not WP:GAB-compliant. Indeed, you're merely casting aspersions on the blocking admin, which is improper, and obviously leads to an immediate decline. Be assured that any similar comments will lead to removal of your rights to edit this page. An unblock request is about YOU, and YOUR BEHAVIOUR (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:32, 7 June 2013 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. {{unblock|This is regarding the response of Bwilkins in my case. I strongly disagree with his contention and take the opportunity to respond to the points that he has raised. Following the block that was initiated by Acroterion which was about improper sourcing,Bwilkins now attributes the block to my person and my behaviour. I have provided my arguments regarding Acroterion and how his reasoning is flawed, and about the issue of biography of living person the conclusion of Acroterion and Yunshui which is completely at odds. Hence, what is being termed as 'casting aspersion' by me should be actually termed professional misdemeanour by the two administrators especially in the case of biography of living persons, as by coming to two different conclusion on the same issue prove that either one of them or both are wrong. This is a serious issue that should be taken very seriously by wikipedia as it severely undermines the perception of the quality of the adminsitrators. I strictly disagree with the 'holier than thou' attitude of Bwilkins as it makes the administrators unaccountable when their actions are critiqued }} :Other users and administrators have been consistent in their concern about your apparent editing motivation and problematic behavior with biographies. The existence of non-controversial edits (which have been allowed to stand) does not remove the concern about a long-term pattern of poorly-sourced edits of a disparaging nature. Your arguments above indicate that you are not willing to alter your behavior and that you see Wikipedia as a battleground. You are trying to use a conciliatory comment on my part to attack others, which has dug a deeper hole for you. Since you clearly aren't willing to take advice and abide by Wikipedia policies, I don't see any point in further discussion. If you use this page as a platform for attacks on others, your talkpage access may be removed. '''<font face="Arial">[[User:Acroterion|<font color="black">Acroterion</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 12:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC) {{unblock|This is regarding the response of Acroterion in my case. The issue here is to provide quality information from a verifiable and reputed source; and the one which was raised in the very first plave. The concerned biography here is of Sulaiman Al Fahim and I have already provided my arguments in the case. The raised concerns about my editing were addressed with the changes that I made with the username Sporadic2013. And that does not cater to the particular sense of vanity of some adminstrators that was raised; however, they are free to have it. You are responsible for your comments whether you percieve them to be conciliatory or as banishment; as I was most certainly not a motivation for the same. My immediate concerns here are quite objective that deal with the discripencies in the actions of administrators which are detrimental to the very health of wikipedia. It should not have been in the very first place, more so in the sequence that they had happened. A wrong stands a wrong. However, you are free to have your opinions about me whether you think that I have dug a hole for myself either shallow or deep in what you percieve as a battleground; that does not refrain me from expressing my genuine concerns about the administrators like youself and the practice they indulge in that has the potential to affect the very credibility of wikipedia, in a negative way and most certainly a behaviour that I strongly disapprove of. That said, I firmly stand by my observation about your ability to handle information sources. Though wikipedia a free platform such cases should be dealt in the most professional manner.}} {{unblock|This is regarding the block by administrator Yunshui who claims that although despite his choice of the username can't speak Chinese or Japanese. I am of the opionion that he shares the same ability in his editing skills of wikipedia. However, coming back to the point, I had shared my observation about the biography of the living person. Since, these administrators were so concerned about my editing, I raise the important point that concern the information being provided through wikipdeia; and with the help of the mentioned administrators. 1. IIMSAM- Constitution and legal status- Please accessthe newsreport by Fox:http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/01/13/protecting-phony-treaties/ Secretary General- The clarification of the UN does not legalise the claim made of wikipedia. http://www.un.org/News/briefings/docs/2010/db101221.doc.htm The news report by Fox also falsifies the claim of IIMSAM's ties with other organisations. The same goes for the regional offices. One can access the sites of respective foreign minsitries whether these countries have provided any official recognition to IIMSAM or not. 2.Collaborative Inter-Governmental Scientific Research Institute In Constitution and legal status it says- Dr. Alessandro Manini is the 'Emeritus' CISRI Secretary-General. What is the basis of this information ?? If these administrators can read and comprehend the English language, they might be able to understand that the existence of IIMSAM is not only contrary to logic but is also wrong. If they can not they can approach someone who can help them understand the newsreport by Fox and the clarification of the UN. However,these veterans of wikipedia who term themselves as administrators are unable to gather it. Is it wikipedia's policy to provide wrong information? It should be a question posed to these administrators especially Yunshi who are knowlingly involed in the practise. The flipside of wikipedia is that it has given people with no talent or ability a platform to wreak havoc. But the notions of freedom of the present day society has given lofty aspirations to such elements with no talents whatsoever. Their liberty is licence that is detrimental to the long-term health of wikipedia.}} |
