User talk:Jesmion

Welcome!

Hello, Jesmion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Deb (talk) 14:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Messiah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 15:56, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi Jesmion!

I'm stwalkerster, the person at Wikipedia:Request an account who created your account for you.

I've been watching your recent edits through your list of contributions and I'm a little bit concerned. It appears you are using Wikipedia as a platform for preaching and spreading the word of God throughout Wikipedia. While I appreciate what you are trying to do, I have to tell you that Wikipedia is not the place to be doing this - we are striving to build an encyclopedia - the sum total of all human knowledge. As to be fair and impartial, we have to maintain a neutral point of view.

I'm aware you're only just getting started on Wikipedia, and as such are likely not familiar with certain aspects of how our pages work, but a couple of your more recent edits have removed large amounts of content from pages - the two messages above are regarding those. Please try and be more careful when you are editing, you can use the "Show Preview" and "Show Changes" buttons to see what your edits look like, and what changes you have made respectively.

If you've got any questions, there's loads of places you can get help - you can ask me here, email me with this form or at wikimedia@stwalkerster.co.uk, at the Help Desk, or you can place {{helpme}} on this page with a question, which will notify our team of helpers to come answer your questions!

I hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia!

--[stwalkerster|talk] 16:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked your other 2 accounts

I'm not sure why you created these, but it seems to be for the same purpose you created this one. Please don't create any more accounts, and please read the posts above as this account will also be blocked if you continue to use Wikipedia as a platform for your beliefs, especially if this is done by removing text or adding inappropriate text to other articles. Dougweller (talk) 16:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC) thanks, what you did was teaching me about wrong of multiple user names, thanks, am jesmion[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User/jjjireh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User/jjjireh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Command and Conquer Expert! ^{speak to me...}_{review me...} 07:00, 24 March 2013 (UTC) you know better than i did, you have stated reason to delete 'jjjireh' you are right hence it's a policy that no one should have more than one name, but i put 'jjjireh' incase if you block 'Jesmion' that i will still receive informion from wikimedia through 'jjjireh' etc, but you can delete it if such is against wikimedia's rules, Thanks am Jesmion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.206.11.3 (talk) 01:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final Reminder

Hello there!

I'd like to remind you that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia built by a community of volunteers from around the world. They have different cultures and religions. Their goals are to build an encyclopedia and to contribute in a neutral, collaborative way without points of view towards content. Unfortunately, for you, this means that Wikipedia is not a place to preach your religion as it is a) counterproductive to the goal of Wikipedia and b) may offend other users. We strive to produce a neutral encyclopedia, which is not compatible with preaching. We welcome your encyclopedic contributions to this encyclopedia, but at the moment your contributions are disruptive, and continued disruption to Wikipedia may end up with you being blocked from editing.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 19:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Alexf^(talk) 14:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Subdomain has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Subdomain was changed by Jesmion (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875186 on 2013-05-07T00:29:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 14:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editor was blocked last year by another Admin, may be the IP on my talk page asking what to do. Dougweller (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yup ... a couple of cases of block evasion (see my talkpage for a couple of them). If he wants to return, he just needs to login here and make an appropriate unblock request on this talkpage for community review D P 10:26, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

appreciate

Hi, thanks for visiting my talk page, could do some good works there, that's good sign of good editor, thanks 41.206.11.22 (talk) 04:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

appreciate

Hi, thanks for visiting my talk page, could do some good works there, that's good sign of good editor, thanks 41.206.11.21 (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

jjjireh

You know better than i did, you have stated reasons you would delete jjjireh, you are right hence it's a policy, that no one should have double username, but i put jjjireh incase if Jesmion is blocked that i would still receive message from wikimedia through jjjireh etc, but you can delete it if such is against wikimedias rule, i made such a mistake when i was a new man in wikipedia with a childish thought of puting all my names in wikipedia with a childish thought of impressing wikipedia,Thanks, am Jesmion 41.206.11.12 (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.206.11.12 (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jesmion

You know better than i did, you have stated reasons you would delete jjjireh, you are right hence it's a policy that one cannot have double usernames in wikipedia, eventhough that i have a pursuit, my pursuit cannot be contrary to lay down policy, Thanks, am Jesmion 41.206.11.13 (talk) 02:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

apology

Help, i have been blocked over the year as disrupt mistake, am so sorry that during the events i was brand new to wikipedia, as i finished studying wikipadia introduction which stipulates that every one can edit unprotected page to correct spellings and grammar, that we should be bold writing wikipedia, with that i entered a username: ClueBot NG, and wrote at its summary, said: Thank You, as soon as i thank finish, i was blocked for Vandalism, then, i appeal for the block and was unblocked by stwalkerster, then, i decided to add some comments in my own page, i was blocked for disruption, then, i become afraid, and start writing on my sandbox only, while appealing for unblobk due to my studies with wikipedia school of open course, Thanks, am Jesmion 41.206.11.31 (talk) 08:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

apology from Jesmion

Help, am so sorry for the mistakes, it was a mistake done in my first year 2013, and i pray that such a mistake wont occur in my second year 2014, multiple user name was when i had not been familiar with wikipedia's policy, but now due to my years of studies with wikipedia school of open course, i can't be mistaking as i had done, during my first year, because am making progress in the studies, am Jesmion 41.206.11.181 (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

apology about sockpuppet from Jesmion

Help, it's actualized fact about the discovery of Chikwudi, it was an alternative username that i used to participate in the on going WIKISOO school of open course, during when i Jesmion was blocked without exact date for unblocking, Wikipedia blocking i Jesmion brought about discontinuation of my studies, in order to participate in school class, i used my vernacular name 'chikwudi' as alternative to introduce myself to classroom and continue my studies of week 1-6 , in year 2013, Thanks for considering me, am Jesmion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.206.11.112 (talk) 09:40, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia by Jesmion

Wikipedia has attractive good features, due to its many associates and branches that could negotiate with it, and bring about varieties of simplicities, and what a massive contributors hedged, simplicities its giantic standardization, its an unanimously build-up giantic featuring an unbeatable encyclopedic strategies, what an input of simplicities? ....am Jesmion 41.206.11.33 (talk) 05:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

apology

Help, i discovered it's a policy of wikipedia against sockpuppet and i decided to use only my first name 'jesmion' 196.46.245.124 (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery about wikipedia

My discoveries about wikipedia, is that wikipedia is an encyclopadic engaged, it has to do with mainly those large volumes of histories that have references attached, although, has not neglect the minor story tellers, but has created a page for them, so that any can make a minor or sketches of stories intended abruptly, one couldn't been aware in terms of ignorancy is being globally blocked, and discontinuity in such case of global-blocked has no specific period of unblock, that's the error of global-block amins, they should at least set a time of unblock for the blocked wikipedians, so that the blocked wikipedians would feel patriotism am Jesmion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.220.69.120 (talk) 08:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block-evasion

I see that you are still continuing to edit without logging in. I also see that you have recently used IP editing to request an unblock of this account (or someone claiming to be you has). I have removed IP-access to this talk page. Do not edit any pages on English Wikipedia except by using the account "Jesmion": if you do so, then you will make the chance of eventually being unblocked more unlikely every time you do. You may edit 'this page only to request an unblock, but you do not have permission to edit any other page anywhere on English Wikipedia unless and until you are unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]