User talk:Lettler/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
It may be of advantage to 'watch this space' in French wikipedia about him. Currently he has no article in his own right but he is mentioned in a list of 'Personalities connected to the municipality' in their article on his birth town, mentioning his Olympic involvement and his death place but shedding no light on how he died. Usually a person who had been killed in active service would have been mentioned as such if it were common knowledge.Cloptonson (talk) 07:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
World War II Service
Hi. Unless there is defining role in the article supporting the addition of "Category:United States __ personnel of World War II", please ensure there is content to support the addition of the category. The person must have a defining role in the war to support the addition of the category, and IMHO, military service alone during the period of the war is not defining on its own to support the addition of the category. I recommend you check the talk pages first before adding this wartime service cats as I removed these categories on many people where the article did did not support a defining role. "Steve Sebo" and "Tony Zuzzio" are two examples. If you disagree, please discuss. Thanks. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 22:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- FieldMarine, your comment is very confusing. You say that the person must have a defining role in the war to support the addition of categories in the American military personnel of World War II category bubble, than you say that you removed these categories from articles where it did support the person having a defining role in the war. Can you please elaborate? Lettlerhello • contribs 12:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for the confusion. I will try and clarify.
- I meant "did not" instead of "did" on my comment above. I have corrected the mistake.
- Wikipedia articles about people should show they had a definfing role in the war to have the "Category:United States __ personnel of World War II" added to the article. IMHO, merely serving in the military during that time period is not defining.
- I have eliminated this category on a bunch of articles with a note on the Talk page. It appears we are working at cross purposes, because you are adding the category back on the examples I mentioned above. To avoid working at cross purposes, as a courtesy, I ask that you please review the talk pages of articles before adding "Category:United States __ personnel of World War II" (or any war for that matter) to see if there is a discussion about it.
- In general, I ask that you please ensure there is content in the article that demonstrates a defining role before adding "personnel of ___ war" categories.
Thanks, Semper fi! FieldMarine (talk) 14:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Eamon McEneaney
Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles under the rationale of "cleanup", as you did with this edit to Eamon McEneaney. Since you've accumulated over 83,000 edits since you began editing Wikipedia in March 2020, you may have learned that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Cyprian Tseriwa may be an Olympian killed in acton during 1980s in Zimbabwe
Hi there,
I noticed you had the category Olympians Killed in Action
I did the Cyprian Tseriwa article 5 years ago. He was the first black Zimbabwean to run in the Olympics in 1960 in Rome Cyprian Tseriwa
I don't know what happened to him after 1980 and while I am in contact with his Grandson, he won't say what happened to his grandfather. I have contacted quite a few people in Zimbabwe on this matter and no one will return my emails.
I suspect he may have been killed in the Guruhundi, the killings of Nkomo's people by Mugabe in the 1980s.
That would explain why noone will talk of him. I've also send a letter to Coventry the Sports Minister to no avail.
I'm alerting you that Cyprian Tseriwa may be an Olympian killed in action, as it were.
Endo999 (talk) 05:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Category:United States Marine Corps non-commissioned officers
Why are you changing Category:United States Marine Corps non-commissioned officers to Category:United States Marines on several Marine Corps NCOs? Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 21:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
The article Alan Peacock (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
per WP:2DABS
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
The article Alexander Peacock (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
per WP:2DABS
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Suicides by jumping in Venezuela
A tag has been placed on Category:Suicides by jumping in Venezuela indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
"American bombing raid" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect American bombing raid and has thus listed it at redirects for discussion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 23#American bombing raid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
"German bomb" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect German bomb and has thus listed it at redirects for discussion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 23#German bomb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hermann Lehmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Richard Malik - how about translating what he did in the war?
Hi, I appreciate you having given fuller details regarding the WWII activities and death of Leonard Malik. The citation used, a Polish language one, is also used in the article on his cousin Richard, who played for Germany and was killed serving in the Wehrmacht but because I have no translation facility I cannot read it and feed the detail for benefit of English readers onto the page. It would give parity if you could enable readers to compare the fates of the cousins.Cloptonson (talk) 10:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- UPDATE: Glad to say, I have been able to translate and so I have now added Richard Malik to the List with the same citation used.Cloptonson (talk) 10:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Lars Winqvist for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Winqvist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
The article A. Porcher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOLYMPICS. Unlikely significant coverage can ever be found.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 06:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
American, female murder victim cats were removed from Murder of Tammy Zywicki; can you clarify
What was the reason behind removing these categories off that page? Were these not really necessary for that topic? Angela Kate Maureen (User talk:Tropical Storm Angela) 21:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
World War I death
Hi Lettler - hope you are well. I saw an incoming link to your userpage after I moved this article. I've updated the page with the info. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Springfield, Missouri shooting has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)100,000!
 | This user has earned the 100,000 Edits Award. |
Keep up the amazing work! 
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People murdered in Sicily
A tag has been placed on Category:People murdered in Sicily indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Sarah Arzu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Sarah Arzu for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Arzu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of J. Bérard for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Bérard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
BilledMammal (talk) 04:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Dana Gordon (painting)
Hello. I happened upon this article Dana Gordon and immediately questioned its reason for inclusion. I saw that you once nominated it for AfD. The reasons given for keep did not provide any notable sources or even sources that were not primary / blogs / etc. Thought you might like to once again revisit Discussion: Dana Gordon (2nd nomination). Maineartists (talk) 01:58, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Ermine Ferguson for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ermine Ferguson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Shirley Codd for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley Codd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Melonie Tasher for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melonie Tasher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Albert Johnstone (sports shooter)
I have been looking up his name in the Commonwealth War Graves Commission website Debt of Honour Register but do not find anyone matching his name and date of death under WWI Commonwealth service casualties. The only Albert Edward Johnstone (to give the shooter's full name, as per Olympedia) was a soldier killed in 1916 aged only 22 and therefore too young to be the AEJ born in 1878. There is an Albert Johnston, Pte Royal Scots, who died on 24 July 1918 and who is listed as a no known grave casualty on the Soissons Memorial in France but details of his age, home and family are lacking. On these grounds the sports shooter could be ruled out as a WWI casualty (unless he is a candidate for discovery by the In From The Cold Project). No Albert Johnstones/Johnstons are listed by the CWGC as missing from the South African forces.Cloptonson (talk) 20:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Burials at Mont-Huon Military Cemetery indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Lettler!
Lettler,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 04:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 04:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- Just noting for the record that Lettler's appeal to the arbitration committee was accepted (per the aforementioned linked block log and this ANI thread). TheSandDoctor Talk 06:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Redirects created by recently discovered HughD sockpuppet. Thank you.User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
"Footnotes" and "References"
Hi, shouldn't everything here be grouped under "References"? What is the point of keeping "Footnotes" if there are only references? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Ferrier. 5.91.22.231 (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)