User talk:Marokwitz/Archives/2010/December

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Problem with WP:Article titles WP:Content forking

Since your first edit to Jewish control of the media was to change its name, I don't know if you will ever bother to read the talk page where I wrote:

Let's keep the issue narrow to Wikipedia policy on Wikipedia:Article titles and Wikipedia:Content forking. Someone has changed the name of the article to Jewish control of the media (Antisemitic canard) to get around the fact that is the least used phrase describing it. So they think that there should be another separate one for myth and a separate one for conspiracy? (And that all information not directly calling something a "canard" should be removed? Which it will have to be, especially in WP:BLPs.) That sounds like something someone who didn't want the issue explored would do.

CarolMooreDC (talk) 15:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for alerting me to the discussion, I replied there. Marokwitz (talk) 16:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

חַג חֲנֻכָּה שָׂמֵחַ

הַנֵּרוֹת הַלָּלוּ קֹדֶשׁ הֵם

Hi Marokwitz! Hoping you and yours are spiritually warmed by the holy lights of
חֲנֻכָּה

Keep up the good work! Chesdovi 2010

Scary graphics :) ... Thank you, and happy Hanukka to you. Marokwitz (talk) 06:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

1RR

You've violated 1RR at the Lydda article, first by restoring your Hebrew information, [1] then by restoring your Kadish/Sela text. [2] You may wish to take the opportunity to revert yourself. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 16:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm not that familiar with wikilawyering, so I can't comment on the 1rr, but FWIW I also oppose your removal of the content as I explained on the talk page. I would also like to second the concerns raised there about your misleading summaries. I recall distinctly discussing this with you on a previous occasions and I also have a vague recollection of some sort of arbcom reprimand for misleading edit summaries. Please correct me if I am wrong.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 16:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Very interesting. Can you please clarify, which edits are you claiming I reverted? Marokwitz (talk) 17:15, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

I linked to them above. I've posted a request at WP:AE#Marokwitz. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 17:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Readers should observe that SlimVirgin did not, in fact, respond to my question (or did not read it carefully) before opening the AE case. Marokwitz (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Since you don't seem to have previous for this sort of thing, I would suggest that you revert your most recent edit at that article. If you do so, you'll probably escape without much more than a warning. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice; I reverted. I am innocent though, as I shall soon prove. Marokwitz (talk) 18:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: POV Page: Judaism and violence

Please see this edit: [3]

Explanation provided at: [4]184.48.93.218 (talk) 02:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Population nr

Hey, you added to the Israeli druze article that their numbers are 102,000, the source is "Identity Repertoires among Arabs in Israel, Muhammad Amara and Izhak Schnell; Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 30, 2004", this is an inaccessible source, could you post the quotation from the source? Answer here. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 12:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I am not the editor who added that fact, this article was split off the Druze article and the content was moved from there. Marokwitz (talk) 13:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

undid some of your work at Sabra and Shatila massacre, you might want to take a look

Hi, I commented out a big chunk of referenced text at the article [[5]], and [here]. It certainly didn't look like the right section, and even in background it might be arguing a point rather than providing info, but since you moved the text to Events I thought I should give you a heads up. Jd2718 (talk) 20:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Inadequate lead

Template:Inadequate lead has been nominated for merging with Template:Lead rewrite. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Please see my suggestion at the above page, --Funandtrvl (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)