User talk:Mkbdtu

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Mkbdtu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Abecedare (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Mahabharata‎, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sock accounts

Please see the messages others and I have left at the talk page of your other account, User_talk:Mkbdce before making further edits to Mahabharata or its talk page. Also let us know which one account you'd like to use from hereon, since using multiple accounts in the manner you are doing is disruptive. Abecedare (talk) 00:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mkbdtu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected administrators of wikipedia,Initially i was unaware of all policies,it was my mistake to underestimate your warnings,please give me last chance,i shall not violate wikipedia policies in future and no extra sock account will be created by me,it is my promise,i hope you will accept my request and forgive me

Decline reason:

With this edit [1] you made a legal threat. Removing it is not sufficient, you need to understand why such threats are harmful to a cooperative editing environment. See our policy on legal threats before making another unblock request. As for the other matter, it wouldn't do you any harm to also review our policies on abusing multiple accounts and how consensus works either. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mkbdtu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected administrators ,i request you to give me last chance as a editor,i was not aware of wikipedia policies in intial stage,i made doule account,then i was blocked,again and again i continuously made multiple account to do editing on wikipedia,but the problem didnot resolve,at last i request you to unblock my this account,during these days i have learnt wikipedia policies and editing method,if a bad man has not been provided a last chance,how can he improve himself then,please forgive me for my mistake,i assure you not to repear my mistakes,atleast give me last chance,thank you

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or

the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 10:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mkbdtu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected administrators,,i request you to give me last chance as a editor because *i have understood that why i was blocked and i shall never repeat my mistakes *i will not continue to cause damage or disruption,give me last chance,i will keep my promise *i will make useful contributions instead. so,please unblock my account,give me last chance,i will give a lots of contribution to wikipedia,thank you

Decline reason:

Sorry, all you have done is copied the provisions given by Sandstein above and inserted "I will not" or some variation in front. You haven't shown us that you have actually put any active thought into why or how you must do these things. Nor have you taken back your legal threat. SGGH ^ping! 16:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mkbdtu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

respected administrator,as i have already explained reasons for disrupt behaviour of mine and promise you not to repeat this again,i take my legal threat back that was given by me and accept that it was my fault that i didnot understand wikipedia policies or misunderstood them,after being blocked i made many accounts and continued my disrupt behaviour due to my ignorance of wikipedia policy,i assure you not to repeat my disrupt behaviour in future and to help wikipedia by useful contributions instead.sir i have requested you many times please listen my request and unblock my this account,i will be grateful to you and wikipedia for providing me last chance to become an wikipedian,thank you

Decline reason:

Your behavior says otherwise; evident from all your socks at Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mkbdtu, especially the more recent ones and the ones impersonating other editors. —SpacemanSpiff 06:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also revoking talk page access as with many of the other socks. —SpacemanSpiff 06:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mkbdtu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sir i am sorry for my rude behaviour and promise you not to repeat this again,i take back my all legal threats and assure you to help wikipedia by important contribution.please give me last chance,i will never repeat my mistakes

Decline reason:

Too many sockpuppets. Your claims of intending to cease disruption are not credible, especially since you create another sock, Chandragupta1 (talk · contribs) ([2]), just to make an unblock request in which you claim you will stop socking. Sandstein 09:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mkbdtu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

respected administrator,as i have already explained reasons for disrupt behaviour of mine and promise you not to repeat this again,i take my legal threat back that was given by me and accept that it was my fault that i didnot understand wikipedia policies or misunderstood them,after being blocked i made many accounts and continued my disrupt behaviour due to my ignorance of wikipedia policy,i assure you not to repeat my disrupt behaviour in future and to help wikipedia by useful contributions instead.sir i have requested you many times please listen my request and unblock my this account,i will be grateful to you and wikipedia for providing me last chance to become an wikipedian,thank you

Decline reason:

Because of this, it is evident that you cannot abide by our rules. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.