User talk:Mzl azakheli

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mzl azakheli, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 15:34, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan[edit]

I undid your edits for multiple reasons:

Your edits are promotional - See WP:NOTPROMOTION
You remove content without explanation in the wp:edit summary
You add unsourced content. See wp:verifiablity
You appear to have a wp:conflict of interest.

Please read these links. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 11:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Laber□^T 13:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Mzl azakheli! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:21, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

April 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mzl azakheli. You have new messages at Laberkiste's talk page.
Message added 16:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Laber□^T 16:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mzl azakheli. You have new messages at Laberkiste's talk page.
Message added 18:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Laber□^T 18:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan (April 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also, reads like an advertisement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mzl azakheli, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mzl azakheli. You have new messages at Laberkiste's talk page.
Message added 15:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I wrote some information for you on what to do to get your article draft accepted. Laber□^T 15:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan[edit]

Hello, Mzl azakheli. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tehreek-e-Dastak Pakistan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]