User talk:Nathantx

New Hope Church moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to New Hope Church. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pearland, Texas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of New Hope Church[edit]

The article New Hope Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Unable to locate any coverage in reliable sources except for the three sources mentioned, and of those, two sources are local newspapers, and one source is a church magazine.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Magnolia, I believe that you are targeting me for some unknown reason. The information in the New Hope Church and Pearland, Texas pages are valid. Just because something is documented locally or in a religious magazine, this does not make it untrue or unworthy of access. I can fix the information that you would like fixed, if you can clearly articulate what your issues are. Otherwise, the information deserves to be published. Nathantx (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Hope Church for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Hope Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Hope Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Magnolia677 (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grow up[edit]

Going onto my user page and removing a template that says "I am polite" is not appropriate. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reading your exchanges with others that are publicly available, you haven’t been very polite to me and a myriad of others. So I don’t think that template is valid or accurate. Nathantx (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]