User talk:No1nintendogod

February 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Newcastle upon Tyne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Martin 13:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, No1nintendogod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions (except the ones mentioned above). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Martin 20:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we cannot accept sources that appear to be the original work of the editor. If the material you added can be attributed to a reliable source, you may add it back if you cite it. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in the verifiability of the article. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop[edit]

Adding yourself to articles. — Manti core 17:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Zuckerberg, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kingdom Hearts, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Svick (talk) 13:41, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No one likes to have to clean up after your jokes[edit]

Please stop vandalizing pages, recently I was looking in Kingdom Hearts when I see the word gay about 16 times, also I saw the word douche. It is not only annnoying but time consuming to fix your pranks. Honestly think about your audience, did you honestly think we would find that funny? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.219.194 (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for trying to fix No1nintendogod's vandalism. I just want you to know that is doesn't have to be time-consuming. In the history page of an article, there are “undo” links for each edit, that make fixing vandalism much easier. Just make sure that you are undoing the correct edit. Svick (talk) 14:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Christian deighton, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Frank | talk 13:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 13:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Yo dawg.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Yo dawg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 20:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The GAC[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The GAC, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 13:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 13:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]