User talk:Obsidian Soul
|
|
|
Note[edit]
I have merged content from User:Obsidian Soul/sandbox/Cleome rutidosperma into Cleome rutidosperma. — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 13:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 16[edit]
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Philippine sailfin lizard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bicol.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Obsidian Soul. Thank you for your work on Balikutsa. Simongraham, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please add redirect categories
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Simongraham}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
simongraham (talk) 22:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Obsidian Soul. Thank you for your work on Balicucha. Simongraham, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please add redirect categories
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Simongraham}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
simongraham (talk) 22:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2024[edit]
Please refrain from combative and hostile edit summaries like Go ruin some other non-European nautical article. Maybe fuck up the prehistoric egyptian boats or something.
This is a collaborative project and you are required by policy to assume good faith of your colleagues. Look, I know that you hate Wikipedia, but if you want to keep editing the world's #7 website, you need to stop insulting people, and express your disagreements calmly and respectfully. Cullen328 (talk) 00:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sure thing. I love collaborating on the world's #7 website. It's awesome.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 04:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Obsidian Soul. Thank you for your work on Alocasia atropurpurea. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
"Thihmwe" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect Thihmwe has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Thihmwe until a consensus is reached.
For the record, this notice is also for Kluai hom thong and Pisang Embung, which have been bundled with Thihmwe. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 06:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Obsidian Soul. Thank you for your work on Lengua estofado. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mezcal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stave.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hi Obsidian Soul. Thank you for your work on Chicken galantina. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Heyerdahl[edit]
Great work there. Hope it sticks. Doug Weller talk 08:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Philippine cuisine template improvements[edit]
Hello. The "Main dishes" section of {{Philippine cuisine}} is too populated. Maybe it can be divided into subsections (aside from Rice dishes)? Do you think adding a "Stew dishes" subsection is good? Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86: I'm not that particular on how the subsections are organized, to be honest. Just as long as it makes sense. Maybe separating soups, grilled, and fried dishes into their own subsections might be a better idea. I think the majority of dishes are stews/braised, so they should remain in the default section. But go ahead, see what works.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 15:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I tried reorganizing it several months ago by adding the "Rice dishes" section. I also asked help from another editor, but the template had not undergone a major reorganization since then. I was hoping if you could help reorganize it into subsections since I believe you know more about the intricacies of the dishes than I do. Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a bit late. But yes, I'll try and help tomorrow when I have the time. You agree with starting with a "Soups" and maybe "Fried dishes" as a start? -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 15:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86: Also, to be honest, I'd rather that the first dish in the template remain "Adobo", heh. Which wouldn't be the case if it was moved to a "Stews" section.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 15:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping out. Soups and Fried dishes subsections seem to be good. If Adobo is the first dish at the start, do you think it, Sinigang, Kare-kare and other more famous dishes deserve another subsection, maybe something like "Popular dishes" (although the term may be contentious)? Whatever you think is best for the template, I believe it would be for the better since it seems to be your expertise. Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86: Nah, I just got into the habit of writing about Filipino cuisine when I have the time. It had awful coverage back then on Wikipedia. I think a "Popular dishes" section is too subjective. Separating "Soups" and "Fried dishes" might be enough for now to depopulate it somewhat.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 15:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I find the coverage of Philippine cuisine (particularly, the separate dish articles) currently impressive, thanks to your contributions. Yes, I agree Soups and Fried dishes might be enough for now. Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanglahi86: Nah, I just got into the habit of writing about Filipino cuisine when I have the time. It had awful coverage back then on Wikipedia. I think a "Popular dishes" section is too subjective. Separating "Soups" and "Fried dishes" might be enough for now to depopulate it somewhat.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 15:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping out. Soups and Fried dishes subsections seem to be good. If Adobo is the first dish at the start, do you think it, Sinigang, Kare-kare and other more famous dishes deserve another subsection, maybe something like "Popular dishes" (although the term may be contentious)? Whatever you think is best for the template, I believe it would be for the better since it seems to be your expertise. Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I tried reorganizing it several months ago by adding the "Rice dishes" section. I also asked help from another editor, but the template had not undergone a major reorganization since then. I was hoping if you could help reorganize it into subsections since I believe you know more about the intricacies of the dishes than I do. Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Edit warring[edit]
Your recent editing history at Article shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Merzostin (talk) 11:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Edit warring on ship-related articles. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 14:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)