User talk:Paradise Chronicle/Archive 1
Your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created User talk:Paradise Chronicle, and I noticed that your username, "Paradise Chronicle", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".
Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi there,
Paradise was chosen because of the paradise papers. Chronicle is chosen because it has something to do with time in greek. You could look at the name as news about the evolvement of paradise in history. I do not know of a newspaper called paradise chronicle, and I now also did not find one with google. There apparently exists a song with the name. This is what I found. I am not involved with the woman singing the song, nor did I know the song before. Is this ok for you, 331dot? If the name really violates the rules we can change it. Best, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- No, your explanation is fine. I apologize for disturbing you. Best wishes 331dot (talk) 10:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Paradise Chronicle, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 24 January 2019 (UTC) |
Rojava offensive
I don't understand your suppression of the source. It's the source of the data. The PKK/YPG/Turkey death toll in Turkey border regions is relevant to the current conflict's background. Accordingly, I restored the source. Thanks anyway for your general contribution to wikipedia ^^Yug (talk) 13:21, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
The source only mentions PKK. I checked again. Not one single mention of the SDF. We don't need to adopt the Turkish view that the SDF is PKK and include such a source in a SDF-Turkey conflict article. It gives the impression that the SDF is blame for anytime the PKK or even a PKK related group (what ever this means) made an attack. At least I don't see the point of it at the moment. I really don't. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ergani—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. JACKINTHEBOX • TALK 04:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
List of arrested Mayors in Turkey moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of arrested Mayors in Turkey, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 01:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much. I asked for it at the tea house. So sorry. I thought it was a draft. Thank you again. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samandağ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican People's Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Edits at Abdullah Öcalan
Your recent edit at Abdullah Öcalan has been undone, for reasons explained in the edit summary, which called into question your interpretation of sources. In addition, I notice that within the last few days, you have been reverted twice at the same article by two other editors: on 2 December by JesseRafe for this edit, and the same day by Manthara for this one, which is essentially a repeat of the previous one. Tbh, I haven't looked at those two edits in detail, but at least in one case, an editor has called into question the claims you made in your edit summary. Please ensure that you follow Wikipedia policy on verifiability, including use of citations to reliable sources, and that your edit summaries are accurate.
If you dispute some of the content that is present in the article, or if you wish to add material that other editors keep removing, the next step is not to revert again, as that could lead to an edit war, but rather to go to the article Talk page, and create a discussion there to talk out your concerns with other editors, and attempt to reach a consensus. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 04:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi User:Mathglot, well I did start a discussion at the Talk Page, and I was told by the same person who reverted my edit the second time I could re-add the info, if I had a source and I viewed the info as relevant. I had a source and that was why I reintroduced the info. Then you reverted again. Can I re-add it also with your permission? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your concern by the way Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pazarcık, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Kurdish names
Hello and thank you for adding sources for the Kurdish names for the settlements. I've found this reference which lists the various Kurdish districts/provinces names. Useful, instead of trying to find a different reliable reference for each settlement[1]. --Semsurî (talk) 22:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Take a look at this[2]. The same people who removed the template from dozens of articles, are now trying to get it deleted.[3] --Semsurî (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 175.203.103.219 (talk) 00:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sorry
I am sorry to have caused you some trouble. I will now take a break from Wikipedia for a while. Lean Anael (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Ok, you're welcome. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Qubad Talabani
Hello, I replied to you earlier regarding the English page of Qubad Talabani. The place of birth in the book is not accurate, will try to find an accurate source.
Regarding the other contents they deserve to be highlighted as they are a major milestones in his life (Operation Iraqi Freedom and KRG Representative to the US) and for Early life, it was placed at the bottom as it is not as important as his political career
I hope we can work it out to revert back the previous content I edited as the structure that it was set in makes more sense.
cheers :) Ditswiki (talk) 13:21, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ditswiki, yeah, good, then we wait for a better source for the place of birth. I'll try to find a source, too. But you can not just copy paste text in the article. Not a single phrase should be copied from an other article. And biographies usually begin with early life and education. Look at Jalal Talabani. Or Albert Einstein and Bruce Chatwin both articles awarded with a Good Article. And read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. I think this helps. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- P.S:
- Of course these guidelines are difficult to achieve standards for just one editor and there exist many Wikipedia Biographies that don't meet them. But on :Wikipedia we are a team and work together. One editor contributes one info to an article and an other one an other info. And an exemption for copying text :are quotes.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of arrested Mayors in Turkey has been accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
GeneralPoxter (talk) 03:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eva Palmer-Sikelianos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delphic Festival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Dear DPL Bot and others who read this page,
It was on purpose because it links to both Delphic festivals because the theme is THE (all) Festivals, further in the edit I also linked to the first and the second Delphic festival in separate wikilinks. From my point of view, all correct, but everyone who feels it is not correct, is free to change it.
Thank your very much for very attentive work,
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adnan Selçuk Mizrakli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
New message from Obi2canibe
Message added 14:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Obi2canibe (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
President of Turkey
Hi, I just wanted to let you know I just reverted a couple of your good-faith edits today in President of Turkey. You restored a section about the residence that had been blanked by an IP, and added a citation. However, the IP is an obvious sock of a blocked and long-term-abusive editor Shingling334, who has targeted that article extensively in the past (usually for vandalism, trying to get the page edit-protected). He first added the section, then blanked it, I guess hoping that someone else would restore it, which is a typical pattern. You or anyone else are welcome to write a section about the residence in your own words. However, I removed the material in accordance with WP:BMB, and I believe it should not be restored. Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elazığ Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
|
Thanks for creating this article. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 16:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC) |
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Edit-warring is not the solution
Hi, Your edit-warring on the Ras al-Ayn page is not constructive. If you are willing to work a solution out I will be happy to cooperate with you. Otherwise, simply reverting my edits will get you into sanctions. Thank you for your understanding. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 00:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks...
...for adding references. Ashurpedia (talk) 16:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Grammar
The proper English grammar is "heavy drinker" and does not need to include "alcohol" and the phrase "first president to die office" is incorrect. It needs to be "First president to die in office". I am an American who understands English, and I can help you out. Can you please revert it back to my original edit. Thanks. Nusent (talk) 13:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ups, sorry I thought you deleted the in office. My mistake.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Şark İslahat Plani
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Şark İslahat Plani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by Şark İslahat Plani and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Flori4nKT A L K 21:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
New message from Flori4nK
Message added 00:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Flori4nKT A L K 00:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi Paradise Chronicle. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 09:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Per your message on User talk:92.44.208.98, just wanted to clarify things for you, you're mixing up AIV and ANI. You reported the IP at AIV, which is for fast response from an admin for blatant vandalism, not ANI, which is a noticeboard, to communicate to admins for more sophisticated and not as urgent issues with editors. Also, unlike ANI, there is no requirement to tell someone you reported them at AIV, so you didn't have to tell the IP anything technically. Hope this clarification is useful :) Hillelfrei talk 13:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Template:Campaignbox PKK–Turkey conflict
Can you make new TAK infobox?Shadow4dark (talk) 07:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- There exists the Category:Kurdistan Freedom Hawks attacks. Is this enough? To start a template... there are maybe needed some more articles about attacks.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Complaining to other editors about IP address edits and some alleged genocide
Hi, no need to complain to other editors. :) We are all grown men here. First, there was no supposed genocide. Second, Armenian diaspora fanatics can take their rhetoric to their made-up articles but they can stay away from articles related to Turkey. Thank you. 176.33.83.45 (talk) 17:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Don't you have anything to say? Of course not. You're wrong and can't accept the truth. 176.33.83.45 (talk) 21:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Tell Abyad is under community sanctions
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.I am trying to ensure that all participants in the recent editing of Tell Abyad have been formally alerted. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 23:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A Barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar | |
| I know we may have clashed before but I really want to thank you for your contributions to some articles that I created. You make good edits and good articles in general. Thepharoah17 (talk) 09:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC) |
Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings,
Requesting you to visit articles Islamic advice literature and Draft:Aurats (word) and pl. do expand the articles if those interest you.
Besides I support multiple women's rights related draft article, while working on multiple themes I get delayed in updating some of the drafts like now Draft:Expressions of Muslim and Ex-Muslim Women through media interactions is notified for deletion for not having edits since long. And I would look for article expansion help, If you find yourself interested in I can share more from my list of women's rights related draft articles.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 04:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hm, interesting area you are into. I must admit, I learned a lot from your approach to me but as others, I am not sure if this is notable enough for an article yet and I for now do not have sources available to help you in your endeavor. Maybe you could use the Aurat knowledge described in the draft in Wiktionary? See here and hereParadise Chronicle (talk) 06:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Benedetta Argentieri moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Benedetta Argentieri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Is this serious? Could you move Shahkulu Sons also to draft space? I recommended it twice for deletion and once for draft space in which it was twice (once it was moved to draft space by an other editor.) The second time the creator just re-submitted it straight without any improvements. It was not even explained what the article is about. If of sons, a principality or a dynasty.
- This (with the title Shakulu sons) was the version before I copyedited it. This was the article how the second time it was released into main space with the phrase: his death was divided into two as Shakulu gentlemen...(who's wikilinks refer to two place names) ...and some of them (2 is "some of them"?) are linked to the Ottoman Empire. I copyedited it and explained that I did not know what I did as I can't read the sources properly. I just gave the text some sense. Benedetta is the director of several movies and one even has its own Wikipedia article Not a fancy one, but it has.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
AE thread
I just saw that in the AE thread you have again posted[4] a comment as a threaded comment in the "Result" section. Please don't do that again and please move your comment ASAP to your own section. You were already told, first by me, and then by the admin Bishonen, that only uninvolved admins are allowed to post in the "Result" section of the report, as a notice at the top of that section indicates. Also, comments like "I have posted the diffs in several discussions before, no need to post it again" really don't go over well at AE. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 19:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- You are right, but you know, ThePharoah17 just got away with so much as you also have noticed. And what you saw is a lot, but they are maybe used to come through with it. I reported them before for removing Kurdistan or mentions in Kurdish language from pages, but they weren't admonished and the report went into the archives. I didn't notice I post in the result section, I was just replying to Bishonen and I have adapted the edit since. Thank you very much for your awareness.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for CE and a question
Hi, I am not a native English speaker. In the article TWoI, the sentence was "...took its strength from popular support which was led by Kemal..." I saw that you deleted the italic and bold part. Was previous version of mine grammatically incorrect or did you change that just to make the sentence shorter? Some help would be appreciated.--Visnelma (talk) 20:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Visnelma, I only attempted to give the section more flow. It can still use more flow. It can still be improved further, though.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
AfC
When you accepted José María Jimeno Jurío at AfC, were you aware that it's creator is subject to a a block and a global ban? Vexations (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- No, but I saw the many links Jose Maria Jimeno Jurio had at Authority Control and checked some of the books he wrote. Check this one. After a short review, it's a rather good book on regional toponyms. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- There are other articles by Ridership waiting for review... Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Paradise Chronicle, nominated them, but Liz already declined the G5 on José María Jimeno Jurío, because
other editors have worked on this article
. In that case, of course, they won't qualify either and G5 is ineffective in stopping sockpuppets of banned users, and the block and ban mean have no practical effect. Not that it matters, the sockmaster is very persistent and will be likely be back soon under another username. Vexations (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Paradise Chronicle, nominated them, but Liz already declined the G5 on José María Jimeno Jurío, because
- There are other articles by Ridership waiting for review... Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Help in improving the Pınarcık massacre page
Hello Paradise_Chronicle I hope you are well. I would like to to ask you if you or maybe you can point me in the direction of someone who can help in improving the Pınarcık massacre page.
I made a revision which I thought was neutral and exclusively reporting the facts rather than pushing a certain POV, later it was reverted by a user called GGT. I want to avoid an edit war, and at the same time I feel there is something wrong going on here that needs to be corrected. For example look at the difference in narrative compared to the Başbağlar massacre. Ayhan Çarkın's statements are viewed very differently in the articles (purely because of the editor). The user GGT has made sure to specifically put the blame on the PKK to the top based on a single source that claims the PKK to have done it, while ignoring or smearing the statement from the ex-police special forces officer. Claims that sources do not mention the confession is actually proof that they don't consider it (really)... So when examining the sources mentioned, they don't even go into Pınarcık massacre to make it relevant to actually be talking about his statement so he's twisting the narrative here. He is very hostile and dodging points, so I am thinking the more parties involved to improve the article, the less chance of a edit-war and a fair engagement and if not then a clear show of a lack of willingness to cooperate to make it neutral. TataofTata (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- I have noticed your discussion with GGT. First of all assume good faith and be patient. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- I've now just taken a look, and I have seen no major changes to the article since I made my comment at the article talk page on the 19 May. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Sark DYK
I'm not sure if the ping worked but I have responded to your concerns about the flag of Sark DYK. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 06:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
bring in Amnesty international source, add several locations and attacks
I think you are not a new wikipedia user. Can you explain why you are making such a request?Why would you not accept an unbiased reliable source and ask for other sources? Waiting for your explanation. Otherwise I will think you are violating wikipedia policies. Gaming the system
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fullstackdev (talk • contribs) 15:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Paradise Chronicle
Thank you for creating Çağlar Demirel.
User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Celestina007 (talk) 02:48, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Murder of Şule Çet
Hello, Paradise Chronicle,
Thank you for creating Murder of Şule Çet.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Surely with the social media campaign this had more news coverage for notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Otr500}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Otr500 (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK holding area
Thank you for reviewing Flag of Sark. Can I ask if you could on WP:DYKNA move the nomination template down to the 6th of August holding area please? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- It is currently held at 6th of August. Cwmhiraeth moved it down before I could do anything. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| For your by-the-book adherence of WP:3RR and attempting to discuss on the talk page when disagreeing with another editor about which word to use in the lead on Tunceli Province Hillelfrei talk 13:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC) |
Self-reverting
Please self-revert fully if you are to avoid sanctions. Thanks. El_C 17:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, only because there is doubt. I self-revert for no reason and take it to the arb-com.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Paradise Chronicle, please do not continue editing while this remains outstanding. A response to this should be your utmost priority. El_C 22:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
That is not how an Arbitration case is meant to be drafted (even all the formatting errors aside) — you need a summary of the dispute. But Arbitration is the last stage of the dispute resolution process. I get the sense that you haven't exhausted other dispute resolution avenues yet. El_C 22:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
I usually resort to you only if there is really help needed, but now you revert my request at the arb-com for formatting. Ok it is a difficult thing apparently. You wrote there are other resources. What are they? Ibn Amr edit wars like a pro and all the wikipedia admins are defending his behavior so far. He literally wrote I don't care as an answer after as he was demanded explanations to explain his edits. He was demanded an answer to this 2 times more before iBN Amr answered with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tell_Abyad&diff=next&oldid=963052636&diffmode=source this which was also not on topic. He is the major edit warrior in the dispute 11 times. And you tell me to self revert? What do you want? I don't get it. Where is the solution, who can help? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Paradise Chronicle, see WP:DRR for more options. Please respond to my query about your last "revert" — I need an explanation about that. Thanks. El_C 23:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- I tried to self revert, I really did. I restored now just an older version in which all the quotes are included. I hope this works for you. Thanks for the noticeParadise Chronicle (talk) 23:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- It does not. Please self-revert that as well while you still can. Failing to do so risk sanctions. El_C 23:28, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Never mind, you are reverting further still? I am sanctioning you. El_C 23:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- i have been restoring to the version just as it was before my first edit today. This version is now at wikipedia. I don't get it, why you are blocking me.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- The version you should have reverted to was this one. El_C 23:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Well, Ibn Amr wrote at the talk page he wanted me to self revert the whole thing at the 8 July. He also mentioned this at the 3RR noticeboard. On the 8 July the current version was the one he wanted. I guess this is a misunderstanding. Anyway, in both versions, in the one El C wanted and the one in place now, all quotes in dispute are included.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- It doesn't really matters what Amr ibn Kulthoum wants — you were obliged to self-revert to the latest version before your reverts. El_C 00:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- This was it. This was what he wanted, a full revert of all the edits I made. That's why he came to you to the talk page. By the way, I have reverted to your wanted version – before, but then you told me to further revert, which then I did. This is just not fair, sorry. There was a confusion, as I told that both versions of you and of me include all three quotes in dispute, I thought you want me to restore all three quotes. But only my version includes all three quotes in dispute, your version only includes one, the one of KurdWatch, mine the one of KurdWatch, WaPo and Balanche.I reverted to both versions, both times trying to do the correct thing and get blocked.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Paradise Chronicle, thanks. I can appreciate your efforts to make it right. I have unblocked you (see below) as a result. El_C 01:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- This was it. This was what he wanted, a full revert of all the edits I made. That's why he came to you to the talk page. By the way, I have reverted to your wanted version – before, but then you told me to further revert, which then I did. This is just not fair, sorry. There was a confusion, as I told that both versions of you and of me include all three quotes in dispute, I thought you want me to restore all three quotes. But only my version includes all three quotes in dispute, your version only includes one, the one of KurdWatch, mine the one of KurdWatch, WaPo and Balanche.I reverted to both versions, both times trying to do the correct thing and get blocked.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- It doesn't really matters what Amr ibn Kulthoum wants — you were obliged to self-revert to the latest version before your reverts. El_C 00:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Well, Ibn Amr wrote at the talk page he wanted me to self revert the whole thing at the 8 July. He also mentioned this at the 3RR noticeboard. On the 8 July the current version was the one he wanted. I guess this is a misunderstanding. Anyway, in both versions, in the one El C wanted and the one in place now, all quotes in dispute are included.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- The version you should have reverted to was this one. El_C 23:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- i have been restoring to the version just as it was before my first edit today. This version is now at wikipedia. I don't get it, why you are blocking me.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Partial block from Tell Abyad
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 23:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Unblocked
Okay, Paradise Chronicle, I can appreciate that there may have been a misunderstanding. I have therefore unblocked you. Happy editing! El_C 01:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
|
Have a cupcake! I have noticed that when other Wikipedians questions your edits, you have kept quite civil, even if they didn't. Also, thank you for reverting vandalism! Wikiffeine •‿• 00:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aziz Feyzi Pirinççizâde has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Pings
I see you tried to ping me and others recently, but I didn't receive the ping and neither will anyone else because you need to add signature in the same edit for the ping to be sent. Thanks for everything! GPinkerton (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021: Arbitration
I have filed an arbitration case request. I have listed you as a party. See: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Syrian_Kurdistan. GPinkerton (talk) 07:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Re your broader draft case request: I would just explain the situation to the arbs (that you were working on a case request of your own, you can link to your subpage so they can see it) and ask them if they want you to file it or not file it. They might want to combine the two requests into one request. I notice at least some of them are talking about a broader case, so maybe they'd deny Gpink's narrower case request and accept your broader request. Or, they might decline Gpink's and not want you to file a duplicate. Who knows; really only the arbs know. Levivich harass/hound 17:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update, Levivich.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Anniversary
|
Vicennalia |
| Thanks for all your work for the encyclopaedia; it's twenty years old today! GPinkerton (talk) 19:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
Kurds and Kurdistan case opened
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 5, 2021, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Well done for your contributions recently, I have found this a struggle and you have been coping marvellously for longer than I have. GPinkerton (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes – Issue 56
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023
- New partner:
- Perlego
- Library access tips and tricks
- Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
CS1 error on Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
Arbitration
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
Miscellaneous
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
Women in Red - June 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Contesting a close
Hello,
I noticed that you wanted to contest the close of the 2023 Israeli judicial reform protests nomination at ITN/C, but you did so by reverting an edit of mine that simply fixed a broken template & leaving a message in the middle of the template.
To contest it, rename the section to change (Closed) to (Reopened) and delete the following from the top:
{{atop|result=Good faith proposal, but a consensus in favor of posting will not develop. Feel free to reopen if the target article receives substantial updates. <b style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#07d;color:#FFF"> Vanilla </b>]][[User Talk:Vanilla Wizard|<b style="background-color:#749;color:#FFF"> Wizard </b>]]</b> [[Special:Contribs/Vanilla Wizard|💙]] 00:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)}}
Then delete {{abot}} from the bottom and leave a quick comment indicating that you've reopened a previously closed discussion, and that's all!
Though I will caution you that you may face an uphill battle considering how much opposition there was to your nomination. Small edits that don't add significant prose are usually not considered by the community to be sufficiently substantial when considering if a page should appear in Ongoing, and statements along the lines of "the oppose votes above are not valid" may not change minds unless the page has received major updates since their !votes were cast, as these editors already came to the conclusion that the updates up to that point were insufficient.
Best wishes, Vanilla Wizard 💙 05:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, my dear, major updates were made before and after the votes were cast. Do you really think, I nominate an un-updated article? Best wishes to you, too.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On operation murat and winter campaign of 1994-95
Why are you trying to change the topics of these channels when im literally giving out proper proof? The proof youre using for operation murat are from an article when the operation was ONGOING the proof i placed was an article updated after the operation had ENDED For the campaign, the campaign was done THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SOUTHEAST TURKEY, no few tens turkish soldiers dead, same with the kurds, check the casualties in kurdish turkish campaign for 1994-1995. TRAVERA1 (talk) 01:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I have seen the names of the "martyrs". But there is no operation Murat in the source. You also removed sources and now I am trying to figure out what the sources from before and your sources say. Please bring sources that say operation Murat. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:17, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I found out that the text of Operation Murat is either a trimmed copy paste from a google translation of the source or you have a similar translation technique like google translate. It's ok for me, but I am not sure if for Diannaa as well. But that the victims died in the same operation is unsourced and I am not sure what the privacy policy states on their mention. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- The listed soldiers are there because if you check where they were killed they are in the zone of the operation, the dates match up with operation murat aswell. TRAVERA1 (talk) 02:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thats not how sourcing works. Maybe there was another enemy in that zone? And terrorism in Turkey, ... maybe a few children flashed the victory sign or demanded education in Kurdish language
- (this is terror in Turkey) and the soldiers died for this? We don't know. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- How could there be another enemy in that zone? If so, they are apart of the operation and they are to be wiped out. Also stop saying as if kurds are being oppressed, there are literal sections for you to study in university about the kurdish language and history. TRAVERA1 (talk) 09:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have never said in our conversation Kurds are being oppressed. Anyway, doesn't matter, the soldiers dying from the Operation Murat is unsourced. They died and this is sourced, but from Operation Murat not and that article is about Operation Murat. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- What youre saying is like, lets say, a german soldier was killed in the area conducted inside of operation barbarossa during ww2, the dates match wehn the operation barbarossa is going on and you say that "he wasnt killed in operation barbarossa" TRAVERA1 (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't believe you could add the name of a dead soldier of Operation Barbarossa if the source doesn't mention Operation Barbarossa. I requested page protection for now. If you insist, I believe you are heading for a block. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- What youre saying is like, lets say, a german soldier was killed in the area conducted inside of operation barbarossa during ww2, the dates match wehn the operation barbarossa is going on and you say that "he wasnt killed in operation barbarossa" TRAVERA1 (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have never said in our conversation Kurds are being oppressed. Anyway, doesn't matter, the soldiers dying from the Operation Murat is unsourced. They died and this is sourced, but from Operation Murat not and that article is about Operation Murat. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- How could there be another enemy in that zone? If so, they are apart of the operation and they are to be wiped out. Also stop saying as if kurds are being oppressed, there are literal sections for you to study in university about the kurdish language and history. TRAVERA1 (talk) 09:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- The listed soldiers are there because if you check where they were killed they are in the zone of the operation, the dates match up with operation murat aswell. TRAVERA1 (talk) 02:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I found out that the text of Operation Murat is either a trimmed copy paste from a google translation of the source or you have a similar translation technique like google translate. It's ok for me, but I am not sure if for Diannaa as well. But that the victims died in the same operation is unsourced and I am not sure what the privacy policy states on their mention. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank You!
Thanks for your contribution to Hafize Gaye Erkan. Kindly review the page. TEB001 (talk) 06:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 57
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023
- Suggestion improvements
- Favorite collections tips
- Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
Technical news
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
Miscellaneous
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
Women in Red July 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Question from Henry, P. V. (00:43, 2 May 2023)
I thought my Sandbox was set up, but I was wrong. I noticed I have a Mentor and thought I'd say hello and thank you. I don't have a question now but give me time! Promise I won't overload you or aim to be burdensome. FWIW, I have Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, and Dyscalculia, so errors occur with Microsoft Editor, Grammarly Pro, and OS Advance Corrections/Defaults. NOT mentioned out of a desire to generate pity (one of three despised traits) but a head's-up that all added AI-Grammar Oversites and the strict reviews/re-reads imprinted on my brain via my former Editor-in-Chief included, I might make an unintentional typo occasionally. I look forward to playing a more initiative-taking role as a longtime Beta and, in general, Wiki-Contributor/Editor, at least as much as the Season/Cycle and Schedule allow. I miss it (Journalism and Writing/Editing/Sharing Info! Sorry you were assigned to me, lol! I hope all is wonderful on our end!
Be well, PVH --User:Henry, P. V. (talk). 00:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
Technical news
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
Arbitration
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.