User talk:PeterSymonds/Archive 22

Archive 15

←

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Account creator

Hey! Thanks for giving me account creator rights. BejinhanTalk 09:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 10:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Dominus Noster

He's been editing as 86.134.231.92 (talk · contribs) since the 13th, given it's a BT IP address, how long a block would you recommend? Dougweller (talk) 14:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

I'd say a month anon-only block would cause little issue there. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Snap, that was my guess too. Thanks for confirming it. Dougweller (talk) 15:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so Much!

Rowdy the Ant has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Ghanshyamji Sock case

With reference to [1], after the application I realised that the user was using not only the IP reported but also IP 59.94.130.167. Both IPs belong to the state run Indian firm Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) and are based in Kanpur, India - and similar edits were made from both IPs on Swaminarayan yesterday. This prob means that the user is using a dial up connection from BSNL and will use a new IP every time he logs on - is there another way to take care of him? Thanks, Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 12:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Unlikely, unless something changes. I'll keep an eye on it. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

User seems to be active again through IP 59.94.134.234 - made some edits yesterday. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 08:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, PeterSymonds. I notice you've given me "Autoreviewers" rights, with the note "Requested by new page patroller". First of all: thanks! Second: What's it mean? :) Dekkappai (talk) 17:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey, no problem. The 'autoreviewer' right auto-reviews your new pages (note the unreviewed pages highlighted in yellow), so there's less of a backlog for the new page patrollers. In other words, you're doing good work, and you don't need to be checked. :) Keep it up. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 17:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Ah, yes, I see such yellow-highlighted gems as "'the gayist person in man kind, also is very fat, lazy, harry, and likes moskalski'". Nope, I haven't created an article like that in a while :) Thanks again! Dekkappai (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Heh. <_< The downside of Wikipedia. Deleted, thanks. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 17:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Request

see here User talk:Ducatista2 is always vandalized by user:DIREKTOR: I request block of DIREKTOR for absurd vandalism and edit war because wiki rules permit use of this page by me. Warning: I am not a sock. Regards, user:Ducatista2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.95.198.212 (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Broken-Hearted Girl

Can u unprotect the page......it has been officially released as a single on August 28, 2009 in Australia.....and it charted it on the official Australian ARIA Singles Chart at number 37......and it has a music video...and it is meets the criteria of having its own article per Wikipedia:Notability (music)........Teammelarky (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Autoreviewer

Thank you! --Bcp67 (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

I feel that giving Eric rollback rights was a weird move. A first time applicant would be considered based on their vandalism efforts. But since his last application, he has reverted nothing. How has this changed?

Also, I know it is easy to remove, but I find that besides the point. Thanks. –túrian^patois 20:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Not really. He wants another chance, and I gave it to him. Rollback is not supposed to be a reward for past work; anyone in relatively good standing could theoretically request it, as long as they are not involved in edit warring, or other such abuse. The rollback right was recalled last August; that is a long time. I will periodically review, but rollback is supposed to be easy to gain, and easy to remove. At least, that is my own opinion on the matter; some admins differ. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Autoreviewer

This is a new one on me - but thank you very much!HeartofaDog (talk) 23:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...

Hey... thanks. --eric (mailbox) 03:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Happy Labor Day!

Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --A Nobody^{My talk} 05:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Same to you. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Lightworker

Lightworker I have some new material for lightworkers page, how can I re submit this?--Outelligent (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

I would recommend submitting the content via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. This active project is specifically designed to help new editors with their first articles, and give them feedback. You might find that more helpful for article feedback. Of course, you are not obligated to do this, but it is highly recommended. They're a good crowd. :) Otherwise, please take a look at Wikipedia:Your first article before recreating the page directly. Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia; I hope you stay with us! Feel free to contact myself or the help desk for guidance. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

How old do I have to be before I can join the account creation team?

When I go here this is the response I get I'm sorry, you are too new to request an account at the moment. How old do I have to be before I can join the account creation team?Dr. Szląchski (talk) 19:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I popped into #wikipedia-en-accounts ^connect, due to my inability to find any documentation on-wiki, and got this: "<FunPika> Apparently if you have not made 20 edits, or have not been on Wikipedia for 60 days, the interface will not allow you to request an internal interface account". Hope that helps. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Hello PeterSymonds. I've tried an entry in my page about puppets and I'm so surprised. I would like to help as much as possible in this conflict for clarifying everything, specially because I guess this is close to be a vandal attack. I've just done what WP:VAN recommend in this cases. I think the basis of this problem is an user called User:karkeixa that created an account, made spam, accused other people against WP:AGF, and reverted several times in just a few days. Then, other user was created, and another more wants to contrast if that two other users are the same. What I've done is trying to collaborate in resolving a situation I thought that was close to vandalism. I think that Wikipedia is another thing. I want to collaborate as much as I can, and I'm at your total disposal. Thank you--Auslli (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Auslli. The issue is that checkuser evidence links your accounts, as seen on the case page. I'll cross-post your comment to the case for Luk's attention. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 17:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to be late... but I think it must considering again to block the account to user "Auslli". His spanish account in es.wikipedia was unmasked and blocked---> [2].

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Auslli/Archive&action=edit

The comments made by this user in spanish llionpedia are being investigated by Spanish Prosecutorshttp://www.diariodeleon.es/noticias/noticia.asp?pkid=482489 and http://www.la-cronica.net/2009/10/12/leon/holocausto-de-genocidio-a-solo-unos-pocos-miles-de-muertos-53109.htm for comments pro-nazis. Nowadays, the City Hall is investigating if "Auslli" and "Abel Pardo" are the same person (In the picture of the news, you can see Abel Pardo". Abel Pardo is a council member of a political nationalist organisation, and the responsible of LLionpedia.) Maybe "Auslli" and "Abel Pardo" are not the same person. (I don't know, i'm not a police man and it's no my problem) But it seems very probably that "Auslli" in Llionpedia, and "Auslli" in Spanish Wiki, and "Auslli" in Englis Wiki are the same user. The 3 users, contributing in same articles (Leonese Language, Kingdom of León, PuntuLLI, Salzburg, Berchtesgaden. As Karkeixa said, this "user" monopolizes and hinders all coments against the Leonese separatist ideology, in en.wiki and es.wiki. Articles like Leonese language, are full of arguments with bad intentions. In Llionpedia, it seems that this user made contributions favorable to the Holocaust (user "Auslli" is the first registered member in Llionpedia, and administrator. He registered on Llionpedia even before the announcement launch). In Asturian Wikipedia, the article "Abel Pardo" was blocked by majority vote. They had problems with several leonese articles, made by users that have intentional purposes. I think you must reconsidering the problem with this user. No change can be made in english wikipedia about Leonese, without his supervision. Regards. As you can see, this issue is important. --85.49.64.200 (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC) NOTE: I put a copy in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Auslli/Archive and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Auslli Obviosly, I prefer not show my name. Be free to investigate in spanish wikipedia or ask to spanish administrators

Sock Question

Hi Peter,

I noticed you blocked RallyGames back in August with an indef. I was just curious if someone had unblocked them, as they're now creating articles (see the recent contribs). The edits appear benign, but since I didn't see an unblock in the log, I was slightly confused. Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 02:39, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, I can only see the stuff created before his block. There's nothing recent in the deleted contribs either. Are you sure you're not looking at someone else's contributions? Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:39, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eldrewitsch

In fact I was waiting a bit to see if anyone would come clean (almost everyone I mentionned (save one) there is probably socking to an extend or an other). I have a bad feeling in my guts there, so I'm gonna email an other CU with my results so they can double check. -- Luk ^talk 09:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Ah, okey. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Bah, I have published the results after doing the check a second time. ^^ -- Luk ^talk 08:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Filthy Language

Dear Peter,

Earlier on you had blocked three IP addresses for meatpuppetry upon my request in regard to their votes on AFD of Abdul Majeed Khan Marwat. Just recently another anonymous IP has written some filth about my family as well as once again voted on that AFD too. Please do something about those comments as well as consider blocking such IP addresses permanently. And can someone take a decision on that AFD because it probably has taken a lot of time. My best. -- MARWAT  12:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I've semi-protected the AfD. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello Peter

Just today you blocked all the socks of one individual vandalising India related articles. He has just reappeared using a new IP 123.237.189.42 (talk · contribs). Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Blocked for 55 hours. Thanks! PeterSymonds (talk) 14:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

May I ask you a question about the Leonese sockpoppet issue?

I was envolved in the Leonese sockpoppet issue and it seems that the issue has been closed. I would like therefore to ask you whether I can keep on contributing to the Leonese Language article (and other language related ones). Since I don´t intend to get involved in useless redaction wars, I think it could be better to ask. Thank you. --Eldrewitsch (talk) 13:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

As long as you do not use this advantage to promote one side of the edit war, that's fine. Just remember to discuss potentially controversial changes on the talk page so there are no repeat problems. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 15:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Zane carpenter

Hello PeterSymonds. It's back again. Could you look at it? Thanks. Antonín Vejvančický (talk) 14:59, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I've blocked the user. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 15:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for prompt problem solving. Have a nice day. --Vejvančický (talk) 16:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

User rights

Hi, I've seen that you changed my user rights from none to autoreviewers with the reason "Requested by new page patroller; user is too efficient". What does this all mean? Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Heh, it just means that the new page patrollers are reviewing your new articles frequently, and they're found to be of high standard. Therefore they don't need to be patrolled by a third party. See WP:New page patrol and WP:Autoreviewer for a more detailed explanation, and keep up the good work. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 15:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

What must i do?

What must i do to regain the rollback back??-- ♠ Dwayneflanders' Talk 22:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, a look at your talk page suggests a couple of things. 1) Do not create articles about yourself; when a page is speedy deleted, do not recreate it without due process (twice). Do not engage in sockpuppetry again (I know you said it was your cousin or something, but that's hard to believe considering the edits were under the same IP address. Even if it was your cousin, meatpuppetry applies). Thirdly, stop uploading images that violate our copyright policy: if you are in doubt as to the copyright status, do not upload it. Finally, your attitude and demeanour have been called into question, and good communication is rather important if you make a mistake with rollback. When those issues are rectified, I'll reconsider my action. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 23:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Cadbury plc

Can you take a look at the persistent vandalism by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/212.219.47.2 Cheers Teapotgeorge^Talk 10:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Re-blocked for a year, per one of the previous schoolblocks. Thanks for letting me know. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

My Page

Will you please restore that material. It was an archive I was keeping for a rainy day not a dispute. It would have been polite to inform me you intended to do that. Thank you. Justin talk 14:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

I was typing a comment about it as you posted. I'm aware of some problems you are having on eswiki regarding User:Gongora, but it is entirely relevant to eswiki, not enwiki. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Again I am simply politely asking you to restore it. I'm not bringing the dispute or problems to the English Wikipedia. I simply wanted to have an archive for a rainy day. Thank you. Justin talk 14:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

If you're not prepared to restore it permanently could you please restore it temporarily so that I can make a copy. Justin talk 14:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Those messages were added to his subpage without my knowledge and consent. I strongly oppose to restore that page. It makes no sense. Regards, --Góngora (Talk) 14:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

I won't restore it here, but I have provided the text by email. Please don't recreate the page on the English Wikipedia. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

That is not a problem, thank for that courtesy. Justin talk 15:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Quick block, please?

24.185.139.174 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx) is being pretty active, and hard to keep reverted.—Kww(talk) 14:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Blocked, 55 hours. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for granting the 'autoreviewer' permission, should save some effort on the behalf of NPPers :) Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  17:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

That's the idea. ;) You're welcome. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Guenter Lewy

Hi - you protected this article a bit ago and you can probably unprotect it now. See here for info. Thanks. - Rjd0060 (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Done. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Account creator

I thought, as well, that this was part of the sysop package, however on 9/15 I was using "IAC interface" and continually was getting the "too close" error on new account creations! I tried several times, getting the same results repeatedly! So, either there was a 'hiccup' in the interface or there was another reason that it wasn't allowing me to do that. The doubly odd thing is that "rollbacker," "autoreviewer," and "edit filter manager" still worked, but "account creator" didn't. I see that you undid that on my user rights, so I'll let you know what happens the next time I get a create account request with a "too close" notice and we'll see what happens when it's turned "off". Thanks. Skier Dude (talk) 23:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Hrm, odd. Did you click the "ignore spoofing checks" option when creating the account? Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 23:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Yep! I tried several "variations on the theme" to no avail :( Skier Dude (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

"Hrm, odd" is a very good way of describing this. Can you give me the request id of the problematic request? I'll see if I can trace it through and figure out why that was doing that. Thanks Stwalkerster [ talk ] 17:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

I am concerned

Dear Mr. Symonds,

A couple of days ago, I got a message that siad that you had blocked a very small edit of mine.

This turns out NOT to have been the case.

However, I am concerned that it appears that someone is messing, very subtly, with Wikipedia's access and contact methods, since I could NOT contact you at the time - I kept going round in circles, couldn't find an e-mail address that worked, nor see this page that I'm typing to at the moment.

Incindentally, the edit concerned tha notorious "Third Wave" political/high scholl class experiment in the 1960's and was as follows: "A full account was given by Ron Jones in the 1980 edition of “The Next Whole Earth Catalog” on pp. 374-377." I could check this, since I still have my copy of said "Catalog"

Yours sincerely,

G. N. G. Tingey.

79.78.29.26 (talk) 07:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

I added the heading "I am concerned". 79.78.29.26 is affected by this range block and has also posted to Wikipedia:Help desk#Attempt to contact a real person, to resolve a confusing issue. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

As far as I can see, this has been resolved at the help desk. Feel free to pop back if there are further issues. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 16:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Anorimoi

Greetings Mr. Symonds.

I have just a single question. Why did you delete from Wikipedia the "Anorimoi" page? It is a popular greek heavy metal band with humour in their lyrics.

Sinecerely yours, Jim from Greece

My Block

I should have not been blocked. I was not edit warring, I was reverting the disruptive edits that Validbanks 34 was making, by going against the consensus of the talk page to leave the OS Family of MMac OS X as Unix. 「ɠu¹ɖяy」¤ • ¢  00:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Another one

Hey Peter! As reported here, this guy is again here with new accounts: Pistavista (talk · contribs) is another. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Raryel

I have counseled Raryel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) with respect to autobiography and conflict of interest and unblocked him. I will monitor him. Fred Talk 03:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi

Hey Peter, would you mind popping over to IRC? I have a quick question. ceranthor 14:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

I was in London all day, sorry. Hope the issue got satisfactorily resolved. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Paradoxic's block

Thanks for reviewing this user's unblock request so quickly. You may also want to at least take a look at User talk:Alefbe; this user was blocked at the same time, for the same edit war, and is also requesting an unblock. (Funny how it goes--both sides always saying "hey, he was edit warring, I wasn't!"). rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I gave much the same response to him as well. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 22:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Good block/Thanks

Thank you for blocking Maneaterwork. Not being an admin I am unable to do that sort of stuff. --Spidey104 (talk)

Heh, no problem. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Deletions

Is it not customary to notify members of a project before you delete their project?Wjhonson (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

What project are you talking about? Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

You deleted a project which had dozens of members, on a basis of a vote of four people, none of whom were members, and where none of the members of the project were notified of the deletion issue. Don't you agree that on that basis alone the project should be restored, no matter what it was?Wjhonson (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, I can only presume that it was deleted after consensus at AfD, or another deletion venue. If you give a link to the page, I can re-review it; if you don't, you can always begin a discussion at deletion review. For the record, though, editors commenting are outside editors, which is a good thing per our conflict of interest policy. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 13:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

London06

If you have any ? about the SPI relating to this, let me know. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Sure, thanks. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

University

I might have a lecturer this year called Peter Symonds. :-p --Deskana (talk) 09:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Haha, great! :) PeterSymonds (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Satanoid, aka User:Morbid Fairy aka User:Analtap

Hi Peter, this guy has returned yet again, under this account here. He is up to his old tricks again. I have already had to warn him for this sort of language Cheers --Sikh-History 16:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Bobmcgerra - images on common

Hi and thanks for blocking. He's also on commons where he's uploaded two copyvio gifs (from the TV-broadcast of the UFC). Could you delete them? Cheers, --aktsu ^(t / c) 10:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Forgot link: Commons:Special:Contributions/Bobmcgerra --aktsu ^(t / c) 10:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Done, thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

sherzo

whats the issue exactly? Sherzo (talk) 14:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't know; it's a private issue that came up during the course of the CheckUser. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

In order to complete the process, please make a confirmation edit to your user talk page?

Account created! In order to complete the process, please make a confirmation edit to your user talk page. In this edit, note that you requested an account on the ACC account creation interface, and use a descriptive edit summary so that we can easily find this edit. Failure to do this will result in your request being declined.I think I did that but I don't know I don't want my request declined. Dr. Szląchski (talk) 04:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

In short, it's just asking you to confirm your identity. Something like "I, Dr. Szląchski, confirm that I've requested an account on the ACC interface" would suffice. The decision to create or decline requests rests with the ACC administrators. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiVoices

Hello,

There is a dispute [3] about the publication of WikiVoices #45 of which you were a particapant. Do you have any comments to add about how this matter has been handled? 99.150.255.75 (talk) 04:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

No. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Another Sock

Just letting you know because you've had a role in the earlier SPIs...there's a new sock of Philbox17...the SPI is here. Frmatt (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Already handled by the CheckUser. Thanks for letting me know! Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:53, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Mythdon13

I really doubt that this is an impersonator.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:18, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Looking at the contributions, it seems clear that this user isn't a new user. I find it unlikely that the names are a coincidence. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

It's an impersonator see this simple wikipedia discussion for info. Powergate92Talk 00:28, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Your help

Thanks! Luminifer (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 16:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Consciousness causes collapse redirect stub

I am unable to edit the page due to edit protection. There have been major changes to the quantum mysticism page. As a result, the Consciousness causes collapse redirect to quantum mysticism no longer makes sense. I recommend that this redirects to the, very comprehensive, quantum mind, which discusses the direct ramifications of quantum theory as it relates to human consciousness. I will duplicate this request on the admin's talk page in case it is not on the watch list. --☯Lightbound☯ ^talk 22:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

This is the inappropriate suggestion, caused by the fact that user:Lightbound does not know quantum mechanics. The page consciousness causes collapse should be redirected to Wigner's interpretation of quantum mechanics,not quantum mind.

Also, I believe that if you review the edit history and talk page quantum mysticism, you will see that putting a block on me was an error in judgement. The article was effectively entirely deleted by Lightbound, who is not familiar with the long history of this subject.Likebox (talk) 05:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Kkavvavq (talk · contribs)

It's been awhile since the sockpuppet has returned. That is Nrse (talk · contribs) aka SgtAvestrand1956 (talk · contribs). I filed an SPI since he is known to have sleepers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)