User talk:Riosaint
March 2022[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Precognition have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Precognition was changed by Riosaint (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869965 on 2022-03-22T01:55:26+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Precognition. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 02:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Precognition. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:57, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring[edit]
 | WARNING: Your repeated reinsertion of your edit at Precognition amounts to edit warring. If you reinstate your edit again without a consensus discussion on the article talk page, you risk your account being permanently blocked. |
With respect to your comment at User talk:DavidBrooks/Archive 4#Precognition, it is Wikipedia's policy that the burden of proof lies with the editor who makes the claim. That means you would need to validate the scientific claim, with reference to reliable sources, made by the person concerned, and not just that he made the claim. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)