User talk:SafariScribe/Archive 1

Archive 1

Good article reviews

Hello! I noticed that you are currently the reviewer for 14 good article nominations. It's unusual for someone to be the reviewer for this many nominations at once. It's unfair to the nominators because they will have to wait for you to go through all of these reviews one at a time. Based on your edits, I get the impression that you're still working on becoming fluent in English, and it's important that reviewers are able to proofread with English proficiency to make sure that the articles are clear and concise. You might want to consider applying {{db-g7}} to the review pages, which will have them deleted and reset it so another reviewer can work on them. I really appreciate that you're trying to help though, and there are a lot of other options available at the WP:TASKCENTER if you're interested. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Welp, I bore in mind to finish reviewing the articles by tomorrow or next. I don't see how bad it is while there are plenty nominations there still waiting for review at it's second week or third. While I appreciate your effort in reminding me what I am already doing. It's a bad imperative for for this line Based on your edits, I get the impression that you're still working on becoming fluent in English, and it's important that reviewers are able to proofread with English proficiency to make sure that the articles are clear and concise. While I also know there could be error via typo which is just a mistake; I haven't seen my review being bad to this Wiki or having default in English. It well @Thebiguglyalien but I will ask you list where I have used bad English in my reviews and i will clear the backlog and leave Wikipedia for good. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

I certainly don't want you to leave Wikipedia, but even this reply has phrases that are not properly structured or sound unusual to a native speaker. Most of the copyedits you suggest in the reviews are not constructive. I also hope you weren't planning on doing 14 reviews in one or two days, because that would mean rushing them and not giving them the time they deserve. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Otuọcha. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Justin Jin (entrepreneur), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. I knew you from Swapd please enlist your paid editings DIVINE 17:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

How is it vandalism that I have served as a rollbacker for a few years in this community? are you afraid of that you were involved in UPE? DIVINE 17:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)